I dread to ask, what is needed before this article can get an FA nom?
Serendipodous 10:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The composition section makes no mention of ammonia, which may form part of the lower cloud layers and be dissolved in the liquid water layer.
[1] Otherwise the article seemed fine to me, with perhaps a few minor tweaks needed here and there. —
RJH (
talk) 20:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
Automated Peer Review
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic
javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
[?]
Done Well, I've condensed two paragraphs.
Serendipodous 17:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per
WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.
[?]
Done I've removed some info and placed it in visibility.
Serendipodous 17:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
Done
Serendipodous 17:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Per
Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 500 kilometers, use 500 kilometers, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 500 kilometers.
[?]
Done At least as far as I can tell.
Serendipodous 17:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
Done
Serendipodous 17:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
Done
Serendipodous 18:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
That's a quote.
Serendipodous 17:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
- There are a few occurrences of
weasel words in this article- please observe
WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
- it has been
- might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please
strike this comment).
[?]
I'm not sure where they are.
Serendipodous 18:26, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either
American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honour (B) (American: honor), meter (A) (British: metre), recognise (B) (American: recognize), ization (A) (British: isation), analyze (A) (British: analyse), travelled (B) (American: traveled), grey (B) (American: gray).
Done Took a while.
Serendipodous 18:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
You may wish to browse through
User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks,
Davnel03 13:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
2nd Automated Peer Review
Well done for managing to cover the above. I did the automated peer review again, and these are the results that come back:
- The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
[?]
I can't make the lead any shorter without removing paragraphs.
Serendipodous 11:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per
WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.
[?]
There is no information in the lead that isn't mentioned somewhere else in the article.
Serendipodous 11:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Per
Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 720 kilometres, use 720 kilometres, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 720 kilometres.
[?]
It would help if the program could tell me where they are.
Serendipodous 11:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
Where are the unstandard abbreviations?
Serendipodous 11:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
As far as I can tell, all the years with full dates are linked.
Serendipodous 11:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
That's in a quote. Shouldn't this program ignore sections in quotes?
Serendipodous 11:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
- There are a few occurrences of
weasel words in this article- please observe
WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
- it has been
- might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please
strike this comment).
[?]
Again, please tell me where they are, and I'll get rid of them.
Serendipodous 11:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either
American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honour (B) (American: honor), meter (A) (British: metre), metre (B) (American: meter), recognise (B) (American: recognize), ization (A) (British: isation), analyze (A) (British: analyse), travelled (B) (American: traveled), grey (B) (American: gray).
I have gone through this article four times with a British spell checker and there are no US English flags.
Serendipodous 11:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
- As done in
WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the
CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
[?]
I've gone through the article and I can't find any examples of that. EDIT: Found an extra full stop.
Serendipodous 11:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
Hope this helps you further better the article. Thanks,
Davnel03 20:57, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
reply