This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because... I'd like some feedback on grammar, structure, and length, and whether this stands a chance at FAC.
"presumed to be thunder," - might need a source for this statement
I've moved the reference forward.
"as "though [he] was back in the firing line overseas"" - need a source for the quote. Also per
WP:MOS#Italics you don't need quotation marks and italics (for the whole article)
Ditto above for the reference. For the quotes, fixed, although I think it looks better the other way :)
It does, usually, but there's this thing called consensus ;) dihydrogen monoxide (
H2O) 22:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)reply
"of the main Central railway station" - not sure if it should be capitalised...
You can tell you aren't a Sydney resident :) It is meant to be capitalised, but I can see why one may think otherwise
As usual, nice stuff. Looking forward to FAC. No concerns re. length. dihydrogen monoxide (
H2O) 09:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Cheers, thanks for that. Will post my notes to yours tomorrow afternoon.
Daniel (
talk) 11:31, 13 March 2008 (UTC)reply