This is an
essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
Editors sometimes wonder what they should do on finding a correct but uncited statement in an article.
If there is unsourced info in an article, but you believe it to be true, you have several options:
Note that not all statements need be cited to a source (see Wikipedia:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue). If a statement is not a quotation, is not an extraordinary claim, is not controversial or challenged or likely to be challenged, and is not a negative statement about a living person, a source is not required (see Wikipedia:When to cite). Adding a source in such cases may be helpful, but is not essential. In some cases it can even be over-citation.
Things that are general or subject-specific common knowledge often do not need citations. The plot of a work of fiction (particularly in an article about that work) is implicitly cited to the work itself, and does not normally need any other citation. A fact cited in one place in an article but mentioned in other places in the same article need not be re-cited at each mention. This is particularly true of statements in the lead section that properly summarize cited content from the body of the article.
When a statement is cited, but the statement is not properly supported by the cited source, it is usually a good idea to add {{ fv}} after the citation, to indicate that a verification has failed. After that, one may proceed as if the statement was uncited.