From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was (Not so) Speedy delete. Page was an exact copy of another, previously deleted page. Deleted under CSD G4 Pilif 12p 20:05, 18 December 2011 (UTC) reply

User:NWA.Rep/Andre DeAngelo Wallace Jr

User:NWA.Rep/Andre DeAngelo Wallace Jr ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Pretty much all of the things that got his userpage deleted at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:NWA.Rep are on this page. Information that can't possibly be true? Check. China=shame? Check. Misogynistic comments? Check. The only things he didn't bring over were the attack on Future Perfect and the claim of work not done.

Note that I'm bringing this up because it was mentioned at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion.2FUser:NWA.Rep. Sven Manguard Wha? 09:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Pretty off-topic here, but I think you mean Future Perf, not Future Prof. Future perfect at sunrise is a fictional tense in yodelling, introduced by Loriot, Germany's most popular comedian. See 1:40 in the famous yodel diploma sketch for the original context. (Has English subtitles and is well worth watching.) Hans Adler 10:54, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Fixed. Sven Manguard Wha? 12:17, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Question - Should this page maybe instead be reclassified as "humor"? When I saw the line about being despondent over being blocked from wikipedia, it occurred to me that this thing must be a satire. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 10:08, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply
    • Look at the deleted page I linked to. It's not humor, it's a marginally sterilized copy of a rather nasty page. A look at the edit history shows it's not even NWA that did this, it was someone else. Sven Manguard Wha? 12:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply
No, that was NWA in a previous incarnation. -- Elen of the Roads ( talk) 14:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply
I believe what Sven is referring to is the fact that Bishonen created the subpage and copied in the text from NWA's userpage. NWA has not edited the subpage. 28bytes ( talk) 15:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Mhmm, 28bytes is correct. Sorry for any confusion. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply

WHY DON'T YOU NOMINATE User:Ryeinn FOR DELETION? WHY AM I THE ONLY ONE TARGETED BY THIS GROUP OF ARBCOM VOTERS GUIDE WRITERS? MOST WIKIPEDIANS DON'T EVEN KNOW MY USERPAGE GOT DELETED. NOTHING WAS SAID ON AN/I TO INVITE MORE COMMUNITY INPUT LIKE PAST DISCUSSIONS ABOUT MY USERPAGE (WHICH ALWAYS ENDED IN NO CONSENSUS) AND EVEN THE MFD SHOULD HAD BEEN CLOSED FOR NO CONSENSUS. IT IS OBVIOUS THAT A SMALL GROUP OF PEOPLE WANT TO DESTROY EVERYTHING THAT IS DEAR TO ME ON THIS ENCYCLOPEDIA BY SNEAKING THE MFD THROUGH WITHOUT INVITING MORE COMMUNITY INPUT. THERE ARE A LOT OF QUESTIONABLE USERPAGES OUT THERE. User:Sky Divine HAD A LOT OF QUESTIONABLE STUFF ON HIS UNTIL I REMOVED THEM ONLY FEW DAYS AGO. NO ONE WAS NOMINATING HIS PAGE FOR DELETION. IF ANYONE CAN'T SEE THIS AS VENDETTA, THEY'RE BLIND. JUST BAN ME. THAT'S THE GOAL OF THIS UNWARRANTED HARASSMENT CAMPAIGN ANYWAY. BETTER YET JUST FUCKING KILL ME. WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?-- NWA.Rep ( talk) 17:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply

If 30 kilobytes on this website are so important to you, there's nothing stopping you from asking for the page back at WP:DRV. → Σ τ c. 01:05, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Comment. All this silliness reminds me that one of the most common reasons for a block over at the German Wikipedia is "No discernible intent for encyclopedic collaboration". I have always wondered why this block reason is never used here. Hans Adler 01:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.