- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD ( talk) 17:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Template:User Wikipedia/Autoconfirmed
This is a pseudogroup and is not used for many users. Eye snore ( pending changes) 03:11, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Question There are lots of useless user boxes. What is special about this one? (It's being used by about 60 or 70 people.) -- Klein zach 05:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep It would be handy if the box came with a verify link (assuming Autoconfirmed is verifiable). In the meantime, all it's doing is consuming "valuable" disk space.-- Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 16:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: What about all the other "useless" userboxes? What is so wrong with this one? Nothing is, it seems like to me. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me... review me... 05:50, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: The only thing disruptive going on here is that now everyone 'with' this userbox has a huge MfD notice. I agree that there are lots of "useless" userboxes, but this, actually, is not one of them. What if a brand new user has something very useful to contribute and simply wants to notify a confirmed/autoconfirmed user about this? I think that this template should be kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackson Peebles ( talk • contribs) 21:53, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- This is a redundant bauble, but so are all other userboxes. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 14:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.