The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This book is both extremely niche and also extremely broad in its scope. If Carmarthen were a city or even a larger town with more sports clubs to choose from, this might be a worthwhile pursuit, but with one minor football club and two relatively obscure rugby clubs, this subject is hardly worth covering, much less by a Wikipedia Book. –
PeeJay 18:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. –
PeeJay 18:04, 30 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, not merited.
GiantSnowman 18:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)reply
This book started out simply as someone's test book and only had the article
Carmarthen and the disambiguation page
Oakwood. I wanted to salvage the book instead of deleting it, so I read the entire Carmarthen article to search for a good book topic based on something to do with the place. I thought their sports teams would be as good a topic as any, so I added their articles and I took out the Oakwood page. Yes, it does seem a topic that would be interesting mainly to the residents of Carmarthen and few others, but as
Help:Books says in its tips for creating great books, "There are almost no limits when creating books from Wikipedia content. A good book focuses on a certain topic and covers it as well as possible. A meaningful title helps other users to have the correct expectation regarding the content of a book." I think this is what I have done with this book. But if more people insist this is not a big or important enough topic for a community book to cover, then I ask that the book be moved to
User:Pgadd/Books/Carmarthen and Its Football and Rugby Union Clubs,
User:Pgadd being the one who started the book.
Daveman16 (
talk) 01:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Userfy - Admittedly niche, but not entirely sure what guidelines are being used to support deletion here.
Fenix down (
talk) 10:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.