The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Speedy Delete by User:Future Perfect at Sunrise as vandalsim. Non-admin closure. -- UsaSatsui ( talk) 08:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:MAPOFTWATISTAN.png

Image:MAPOFTWATISTAN.png ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ann hphg ( notify | contribs).

• Seems to be an edited image of google maps. WP:NFT I'd venture. Q ^{T C} 00:34, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply
• Please co-delete Image:BREAKINGDAWNPLAGUE.png and Image:CHURCHOFHEATHUSANDLEDGERSAINTS.jpg, which were used in the same hoax article. -- Masamage ♫ 00:52, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was:

- Delete - as a side note to the below discussion: The image of less than ideal quality (looks like it is taken through a window) and can easily be replaced - seems unlikely to be used in an article - 
Peripitus 
(Talk) 08:30, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
reply 

Image:DSC02592.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Oguzhantr ( notify | contribs).

• Orphaned image that does not seem to contain any encyclopedic properties. Q ^{T C} 00:56, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. — BQZip01 —  ^talk 04:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep -- I spent a few minutes, and finished filling out the image description template. Geo Swan ( talk) 10:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply
• Query I think the problem lies not in the technical details of what the image purports to show, but how it could be used on Wikipedia. If it can't be used, then there is no reason to keep the image. — BQZip01 —  ^talk 19:09, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply
  • It could be used in articles on audio-visual connectors. Geo Swan ( talk) 20:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Speedily deleted by User:Ian13 under criteria I9. Non-admin closure. -- UsaSatsui ( talk) 08:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:Aa444a.jpg

Image:Aa444a.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Oguzhantr ( notify | contribs).

• Image claim self made of desktop with is under copyright with no fair-use claims. Q ^{T C} 00:58, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Speedily deleted by User:Ian13 under criteria I9. Non-admin closure. -- UsaSatsui ( talk) 08:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:AdDSDSADSADsız.JPG

Image:AdDSDSADSADsız.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Oguzhantr ( notify | contribs).

• Orphaned Unencyclopedic image Q ^{T C} 00:58, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Speedily deleted by User:Ian13 under criteria I9. Non-admin closure. -- UsaSatsui ( talk) 08:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:Adsızadfafa.JPG

Image:Adsızadfafa.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Oguzhantr ( notify | contribs).

• Orphaned Unencyclopedic image Q ^{T C} 00:59, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Speedy delete.

--
Masamage 
♫ 01:52, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
reply

Image:CHURCHOFHEATHUSANDLEDGERSAINTS.jpg

Image:CHURCHOFHEATHUSANDLEDGERSAINTS.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ann hphg ( notify | contribs).

• The source website ChurchSignGenerator claims:

Can I use a photo in the Real Church Signs gallery in my book/magazine? Maybe. With the exception of few photos I took personally, the photos in the Real Church Signs gallery were taken by others. I don't own them, I only display them on my site with their permission, so you'll have to get their permission for any other use.

Furthermore, according to the sourced website:

Source photo courtesy of Stewart Church Signs

Therefore the uploader cannot claim a CC license as s/he is likely not the original copyright owner. Q ^{T C} 01:26, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Oh, that does make it speedy-deletable. As the person who removed the original speedy deletion nom, I will now go back and delete it after all. -- Masamage ♫ 01:49, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was:

- Keep - Still orpaned but an editor sees an encyclopedic use for it 
Peripitus 
(Talk) 08:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
reply

Image:Metrobus.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Squatchy ( notify | contribs).

• Orphaned. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 17:29, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep Found a use for it. Merely being orphaned does not qualify an image for deletion. — BQZip01 —  ^talk 02:55, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was:

- Delete - odd one this but is seems clear. This is a photo of a framed painting. While the painting is of a local god, whose generic image will not be affected by copyright, this particular representation is the work of an artist. As an artwork the painting is covered by copyright and the photo is a derivative work. If it were fair-use tagged it would fail NFCC#1 as a clearly replaceable image - 
Peripitus 
(Talk) 07:23, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
reply

Image:F4e35bae.jpg

Image:F4e35bae.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sputhucode ( notify | contribs).

• derivative work of possibly copyrighted artwork Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:00, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply
• Keep no evidence of copyvio. — BQZip01 —  ^talk 03:01, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.