The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
There is a maintenance template at the top of the article that says that the article contains self-published sources. Because of this, I believe that the article could no longer remain a good article.
GeoffreyT2000 (
talk) 05:11, 3 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delist With 14 of 24 references coming from the MIGA or the World Bank Group there is too high a ratio of use of primary sources with some paragraphs only supported by primary sources.
Gusfriend (
talk) 05:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delist - uncited text, overuse of non-independent referencing, a gap of any events between 2010 and 2019, and major
WP:PROSELINE issues in places.
Hog FarmTalk 03:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.