John Chrysostom

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted I think some of the unreliable sources might be OK, but enough are certainly unreliable and there are many uncited passages that really should have a cite AIRcorn  (talk) 01:42, 23 August 2020 (UTC). reply

The article fails to consistently use reliable sources and also contanins uncited content. I have flagged some of the unreliable sources in the article. b uidh e 23:52, 10 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Here's another source. Can this be used to demonstrate more certainty of the quotes? https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/210204.htm Jbermudes ( talk) 06:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Nothing in the source is WP:DUE unless covered by a secondary source (especially when there are so many high quality scholarly sources available on Chrysostom). I'm not sure what you mean by "demonstrate more certainty of the quotes". b uidh e 06:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC) reply