Bayswater, Western Australia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept all issues have been addressed.
—Femke 🐦 (
talk)
08:48, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
A GA from 2021. Not much work needed, just two main problems. One, Some areas lack citations here and there, would like some fixing. Two, and my main problem, article needs to be updated as many parts of the article are sourced to the 2011 and 2016 census. Also a table for the 2022 federal election needs to be added. Though, since Steelkamp is active I feel as if he can fix this with enough effort. Onegreatjoke ( talk) 01:35, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- You're right, this should be easily fixable and I will have it all done by today. I will note that I was holding off on updating the census bit because of a discussion on the Australian Wikipedians' notice board but that seems to have died down with no consensus so I will duly update that section. Steelkamp ( talk) 02:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Incidentally, I counted six redlinks in the article--two duplicated--but have not checked how old they are. Not a good look in a GA.
Bjenks (
talk)
04:50, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Red links are perfectly acceptable in good articles and even featured articles if the linked pages have a possibility of becoming an article. Also, links can be duplicated between the lead and the body. Nevertheless, I've removed the ones there because they probably won't become articles anytime soon.
Steelkamp (
talk)
04:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging
Steelkamp for an update.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
19:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- The one major thing that needs to be done is the demographics section, which I will do soon.
Steelkamp (
talk)
09:59, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- I think this reassessment can be closed as keep now.
Steelkamp (
talk)
06:42, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- @
Steelkamp: Thanks for the work :). There is one cn tag remaining about cycling. I think it's important enough not to delete. Could you address that?
—Femke 🐦 (
talk)
17:32, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Steelkamp ( talk) 06:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- @
Steelkamp: Thanks for the work :). There is one cn tag remaining about cycling. I think it's important enough not to delete. Could you address that?
—Femke 🐦 (
talk)
17:32, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- I think this reassessment can be closed as keep now.
Steelkamp (
talk)
06:42, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- The one major thing that needs to be done is the demographics section, which I will do soon.
Steelkamp (
talk)
09:59, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging
Steelkamp for an update.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
19:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Red links are perfectly acceptable in good articles and even featured articles if the linked pages have a possibility of becoming an article. Also, links can be duplicated between the lead and the body. Nevertheless, I've removed the ones there because they probably won't become articles anytime soon.
Steelkamp (
talk)
04:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Incidentally, I counted six redlinks in the article--two duplicated--but have not checked how old they are. Not a good look in a GA.
Bjenks (
talk)
04:50, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.