The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
According to Google and scotsman.com, Mariusz Stepien is still alive as of 2022 and no news mentioning if the subject is deceased, as such, this file fails WP:NFCC1. -- Min☠︎rax«¦ talk¦» 05:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned file with no provenance. If from after 1928, it will in all likelihood still be copyrighted in the US due to the URAA restorations. As we know nothing about its authorship, it may well even still be copyrighted in Turkey today if the photographer died after 1953. Felix QW ( talk) 17:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Game controllers are utilitarian objects. Someone should be able to take a free photograph of this particular device. Ixfd64 ( talk) 19:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
De-PROD rationale was this: the chorus is intrinsic to the meaning of the song, like the guitar solo in Free Bird. It's more important than a textual description
. However, the sample of "
Free Bird" was deleted (
FFD discussion). I'm still unconvinced that
One of Us (Joan Osborne song) would be still inadequately understood without a sample like this, and I'm still unconvinced that the sample and free text provide
info different and uneqivalent from each other (or maybe I was confusing what I said with
WP:FREER).
Sure, the chorus and partial second verse heard in the sample help readers identify the part of the song, but I still don't know why other editors think it contextually signifies the whole song other than (supposed?) mistrusting the adequacy of free content. On the contrary, reading the article, the free text adequately summarizes what the song is generally about and the popularity and reception of the song. George Ho ( talk) 22:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)