June 21
File:Laura Wheeler Waring.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- File:Laura Wheeler Waring.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gobonobo ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Replaced with a younger image of the artist at her easel. This is a less flattering image. Rather than edit war I bring this to FfD. So, I want to keep Photo of Laura Wheeler Waring.jpg in the article and delete Laura Wheeler Waring.jpg. Both are fair use images. WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 00:28, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I uploaded this ten years ago. It wouldn't hurt to change it up. While the profile shot only captures half of her face, the depiction of her in her studio with her easel adds encyclopedic value. The CWHF website [1] also has a good image. It is possible that the last photo in this article, labeled "National Archives (HN-HNE-22-15)", is in the public domain. gobonobo + c 04:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:General Directorate of Intelligence Logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 June 28. ✗ plicit 23:53, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- File:General Directorate of Intelligence Logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Elton john-levon-29 sec.ogg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- File:Elton john-levon-29 sec.ogg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rfc1394 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
De-PRODded sample may not need a direct commentary to justify usage of the sample. However, the sample itself contains random segments of the song, making a reader wondering what the sample itself is about. I have wondered whether any sample is needed to help readers understand Levon (song). If so, then which specific segment? If not, then the sample itself would fail WP:NFCC, especially the "contextual significance" criterion. George Ho ( talk) 14:20, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Lodash.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:07, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- File:Lodash.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RaphaelQS ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This doesn't look like it is eligible for copyright. It is only two letters and a line. I think it should be copied to Commons as {{
pd-textlogo}}.
weeklyd3 (
message me |
my contributions) 20:53, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:RIR Service Regions Map 2015.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- File:RIR Service Regions Map 2015.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Saiph8 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Probably doesn't qualify for fair use because we can easily make our own map. Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - the addition of the logos is decorative. A free equivalent without logos could be made that conveys the same information Whpq ( talk) 01:05, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.