April 22
File:1925Earthquake2 SanMarcosAnapamuState.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- File:1925Earthquake2 SanMarcosAnapamuState.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pais ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Image tagged as non-free, but in US its copyright expired in 2021. Michalg95 ( talk) 07:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Yes - I am the uploader - that was a long time ago, and I do believe it is in public domain now. Can anyone confirm? Photograph taken in the US in 1925. Antandrus (talk) 14:52, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Starbucks Workers United logo.jpeg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- File:Starbucks Workers United logo.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shushugah ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails
WP:NFCC#8, as it's not to serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the entity in question.
The article is about
Starbucks unions, only one section is about Starbucks Workers United, and the image doesn't improve that section at all
Joseph
2302 (
talk) 11:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per @ Joseph2302. There's also a new image now with a banner including the same logo anyways that suffices. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 16:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Fijian Drua logo.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:17, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- File:Fijian Drua logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TheMightyPeanut ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Having this old logo on Fijian Drua article has no value, as it doesn't enhance the article. The logo doesn't significantly increase the reader's understanding of the topic, as the current team logo is almost the same logo, just in blue rather than black. So the current logo is sufficient for understanding that the article is about this team Joseph 2302 ( talk) 14:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 ( talk) 19:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Paul Geidel.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Sdrqaz ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- File:Paul Geidel.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Toadboy123 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Wrong file name of the subject Toadboy123 ( talk) 19:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Ho-Chi-Minh-Poster.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- File:Ho-Chi-Minh-Poster.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Frances76 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in Vietnam. Needs permission from artist or evidence that the artwork is in public domain. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Hollis Price.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- File:Hollis Price.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ger9471 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Dubious claim of own work due to limited resolution, lack of metadata and presence of watermark at the bottom. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 ( talk) 22:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Dhananjay-datar-.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- File:Dhananjay-datar-.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Alwaysjoyfull ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Bunch of different cameras from uploads. File:Datar-forbes.jpg credits "JAYAPRAKASH PAYYANUR" as copyright holder in EXIF. Doubtful own work. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 23:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.