From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 15

File:A.S.D. Alliphae.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. plicit 02:19, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:A.S.D. Alliphae.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SMADG85 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Complex logo, definitely above the threshold of originality. Could probably qualify for fair use. Ixfd64 ( talk) 00:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Retag with fair use rationale for logos. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 17:46, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, mislabelled non-free file so I have relicensed to non-free logo and added a fairuse. Salavat ( talk) 06:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arnold Arboretum logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:Arnold Arboretum logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Staviatrixetlege ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Pretty sure the tree is above the threshold of originality. Logo is not used in article space. Ixfd64 ( talk) 00:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Delete - The drawing of the tree is surely not a simple shape. -- Whpq ( talk) 14:37, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat ( talk) 06:59, 17 October 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AssecoResovia Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete as author request. plicit 12:16, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:AssecoResovia Logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Maister1921 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Very likely above the threshold of originality and thus copyrighted. Logo is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 ( talk) 00:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Banks RC Emblem.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. plicit 02:19, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:Banks RC Emblem.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rower51 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Likely above the threshold of originality even in the United States. Ixfd64 ( talk) 00:29, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Re-tag the image as a non-free logo, which can be used on that article under appropriate fair use. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 13:53, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Relicense as non-free -- Whpq ( talk) 14:39, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, mislabelled non-free file so I have relicensed to non-free logo and added a fairuse. Salavat ( talk) 07:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me and Bobby McGee - Roger Miller.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:Me and Bobby McGee - Roger Miller.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Esprit15d ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is actually the cover art of Roger Miller's one of eponymous albums ( ebay, discogs, 45worlds). Incorrectly identifies Me and Bobby McGee. Such usage fails WP:NFCC, probably #8 and #5, unless the album is proven notable. George Ho ( talk) 00:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Samples of Franz Ferdinand (band) songs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - FASTILY 06:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:Franz Ferdinand - The Fallen.ogg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Esprit15d ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Franz Ferdinand - Eleanor Put Your Boots On.ogg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Esprit15d ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Franz Ferdinand - Take Me Out.ogg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Esprit15d ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I didn't know that the samples were previously tagged for deletion, so I'm taking them here instead. I'm concerned about their compliance with WP:NFCC#8. They are used at the Franz Ferdinand (band) article and their respective song articles. However, I've not yet seen critical commentary sufficient enough to support the samples. I recently removed the inline samples from the album article You Could Have It So Much Better. George Ho ( talk) 00:55, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Common - Go.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:Common - Go.ogg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Esprit15d ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Previously tagged for deletion a couple of times, I'm taking this sample to this page. Sample, used in a few articles, may be insufficiently supported by critical commentary and fail WP:NFCC#8. George Ho ( talk) 01:32, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Burden In My Hand (Soundgarden song - sample).ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:Burden In My Hand (Soundgarden song - sample).ogg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by -5- ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Currently used in Burden in My Hand, Chris Cornell, Down on the Upside (Good Article), Soundgarden (Good Article). Sample may be insufficiently supported by critical commentary and may fail WP:NFCC#8. George Ho ( talk) 01:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lilly michelle photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:Lilly michelle photo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Michelle7186 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned, low-quality image of a user who made nine edits 15 years ago. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. plicit 07:07, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Delete - unused personal photo -- Whpq ( talk) 14:40, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 07:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gary Paulsen.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:Gary Paulsen.gif ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Russell Ernst ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I believe this image is a copyrighted author photograph which the uploader falsely claimed as their own. It is a low resolution image uploaded back in 2008. The uploader had another image of the same author which was previously deleted for being unfree. It included the same rationale, as does their upload of the author's signature. Οἶδα ( talk) 07:45, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Delete - Own work is very dubious. This archive of a Good Reads profile predates the upload and includes the image. The subject is deceased so there is a possibility of converting to non-free usage, however the subject is very recently deceased, and the possibility exists for a freely licensed image to be turned up. The subject was an author who did book signings. This image is an example and is almost free enough, but the non-commercial restriction makes it not quite free enough for Wikipedia. -- Whpq ( talk) 14:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Americanexpressplatinumemvcontactless.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:Americanexpressplatinumemvcontactless.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Reclusive123 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Used on two articles. On American Express it fails WP:NFCCP point 1, as there are free alternatives (the Amex logo and contactless symbol are both in the article as free images). On contactless payment, it also fails NFCCP point 1, as there is a free image of a contactless card on that article, so we again don't need this non-free image there either Joseph 2302 ( talk) 13:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shunno Band Members.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:Shunno Band Members.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Alimus Sifar ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Claimed to be own work, but this is obviously a publicity photo. The uploader has a history of copyright violations. See this warning. The claim to being the copyright holder would need WP:VRT confirmation. Note that the same file on Commons is also nominated for deletion. Whpq ( talk) 14:19, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WBBL05CapLogoHeat.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:WBBL05CapLogoHeat.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PabloWarhola ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Australia has a very low threshold of originality. The flames probably put this logo above the ToO even in the United States. Ixfd64 ( talk) 17:05, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Delete as enough originality in the logo that it's not freely licenced. And none of the articles currently using it could use it under an appropriate fair use licence. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 17:44, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MAD VMA 2013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. plicit 02:16, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:MAD VMA 2013.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Eurofan2005 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I'm not sure this is considered a simple logo. Ixfd64 ( talk) 17:10, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Keep, mislabelled non-free file so I have relicensed to non-free logo and added a fairuse. Also I removed it from the MAD Video Music Awards article as it didn't seem to have any purpose being there. Salavat ( talk) 07:06, 17 October 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nagareboshi title card.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. plicit 02:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:Nagareboshi title card.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Baboona ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Probably not a simple logo due to the background. Ixfd64 ( talk) 17:12, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Keep, mislabelled non-free file so I have relicensed to non-free title-card and added a fairuse. Salavat ( talk) 07:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ajax Wanderers 2013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. plicit 02:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply

File:Ajax Wanderers 2013.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rob.riegert ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I wouldn't consider this a simple logo. Ixfd64 ( talk) 17:13, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Re-tag using the fair use rationale for logos/emblems. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 17:45, 15 October 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, mislabelled non-free file so I have relicensed to non-free logo and added a fairuse. Salavat ( talk) 07:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.