The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Low quality image (frame size is too big in relation to actual content) Keministi ( talk) 03:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:19, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Un-splittable file, No confirmation of a 'free' license for either version. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 07:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Un-splittable file, Unused. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 07:58, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Un-splitable file. Unclear which revision the attached information is supposed to be associated with. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 08:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: not deleted and there is no real need to split the image anyway unless it is useful in some way - it is common practice on Wikipedia to have updated versions of a chart or a table uploaded over top of each other. -- B ( talk) 21:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Unsplitable file, No license or incomplete information for overwritten/reverted revisions. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 08:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Apparently un-splittable file, Most recent revision on Commons as File:GPS signal modulation scheme.svg ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 08:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Apparently un-splittable file, No license information for most recent revision ( most likely pd-art). ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 08:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Apparently unsplittable file, both versions for meta-date in summary, and the image is in use. If it can be split to two files both should be on Commons. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 08:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Apparently unsplittable file, In-use, Given meta-data relates to previous upload. Most recent revision is not PD-US as it was taken in 2006 ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 08:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Apparently un-splittable file, Which (or both) of the revisions was under the given license? ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 08:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Apparently unsplittable, information block relates to most recent revision, apparently this was uploaded because of a lack of clarity about the original upload under this name. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 08:12, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Apparently unsplittable, Which version is current? File notes it has been superseded anyway, but is is still in use in one article. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 08:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Which revision does the added information block actually refer to? Lack of clarity regarding this. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 08:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Apparently un-splitable file, unused. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 08:16, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Apparently un-splittable, unused barring one redirect. Meta-data for revisions seems to be in the edit summaries. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 08:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Aparrently un-splittable, Only used in user space, intervening image is 2D artwork (and thus not necessarily subject to FoP exemptions.) ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 08:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Apparently un-splittable, Information for original upload is apparently only on the file description page for that upload. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 08:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Image of living persons. need permission via OTRS. the uploader has submitted many copyvios. Saqib ( talk) 10:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Photo of unidentified subject with unclear permission. Stefan2 ( talk) 11:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Technically un-sourced, but pre 2006 upload and in use, Hence FFD referal ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. Withdrawn by nom in favour of alternative forums of discussion. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 03:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Various portrait images, claimed GFDL, but technically unsourced or lacking in ways to confirm that license. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
This is a photo of a person who does not have a corresponding article. For the last three years, there have been various and sundry attempts to turn the image description page into an article. The person depicted seems very possibly notable and the photo would even be potentially useful in an article about this person. The problem is, however, that it appears to be Flickrwashing. The source given is a Flickr account with two images, one of which is clearly a screenshot from a video of some sort. It was uploaded to Flickr two days before it was uploaded here. It is highly unlikely that the license is valid. B ( talk) 13:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Missing evidence of permission. Please follow WP:DCP to get the file restored - FASTILY 00:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Image description page says "Photographer: Paul Chapman" but gives no indication whether Paul Chapman is the uploader or someone else. This is a very nice photo and it would be nice if we could keep it. (Unfortunately, the uploader does not have email enabled.) B ( talk) 13:30, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
I am the uploader - leeph and the helicopter pictured as the subject of the image is my property. The photographer Paul Chapman is an aeromodeller friend of mine. I don't fully understand your message about the photo 'it would be nice if we could keep it' without letting me know why it is that you might *not* be able to keep it?
I'm afraid I am a novice Wikipedia user and therefore I am not au fait with your processes and policies, and I am assuming that this has been flagged for lacking the appropriate copyright statement/permission for use. Please advise what you need me to do. I can obtain written permission from the photographer if needed.
leeph ( talk) 14:44, 17 September 2018 (BST)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Purportedly a photo of Richard E. Killblane with no real source (I'm not sure if it is him or not). It was obviously taken by a US service member, but we would need to know that it was taken in his official duties, not just while he was taking photos for fun. There is an unquestionably PD photo of him at https://www.army.mil/article/178622/rpoe_deployments_to_be_documented that we can use, so unless we can get clarification, I don't know that we need this one. B ( talk) 15:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
I improperly uploaded this as PD, this issue is one of several that are not PD in the series due to reprints of newspaper comics still in copyright. Etzedek24 ( I'll talk at ya) ( Check my track record) 16:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Presumed own work, and in use hence FFD referral. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 16:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Unused, purpose or link to notable subject unclear. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 17:09, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 30. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:20, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Unused Wikipedia screenshot ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 18:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete As said below, this is a derivative work of the copyrighted sign. The text of an historical marker can be used as a citation without a photo of it being stored on wiki. Obviously, if it is something controversial, evidence would be nice, but this isn't really something that will stir up controversy. And I suppose if someone challenges this, an administrator can look at the deleted revision. -- B ( talk) 23:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Photo of third party artwork with separate copyright ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 19:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)