From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 9

File:Headshot for American actor Jilon VanOver, 2011.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:07, 21 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Headshot for American actor Jilon VanOver, 2011.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kabhyasa ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

missing evidence of permission; invalid OTRS ticket - no license was specified in the permissions email. FASTILY 08:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

@ Missvain:? Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Douglas Moran.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 18:11, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Douglas Moran.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mrtraska ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused (personal) image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 11:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Xulfi at concert.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 18:11, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Xulfi at concert.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Graphicalx ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

tagged as OTRS permission insufficient for nearly a year; after reviewing the ticket, I suspect it is unlikely permission will be confirmed FASTILY 08:41, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Human ear (left, blurry).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Human ear (left, blurry).jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Webfan29 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

low-quality photo, superior versions available Jon Kolbert ( talk) 16:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 11:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Karikala map.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Karikala map.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Senthilkumaras ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

superseded by vector maps Jon Kolbert ( talk) 17:08, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 11:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pandyars.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Pandyars.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Senthilkumaras ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

superseded by vector maps Jon Kolbert ( talk) 17:08, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 11:50, 11 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HankKraft.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:HankKraft.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CrazyAces489 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use Jon Kolbert ( talk) 17:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 11:50, 11 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tn 505 spring meadow pressback side.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Tn 505 spring meadow pressback side.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wiki-chadwick ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

web-quality image, unlikely to be uploader's own work Jon Kolbert ( talk) 17:29, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat ( talk) 11:50, 11 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tn mf8064dr-w-accessories.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Tn mf8064dr-w-accessories.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wiki-chadwick ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

web-quality image, unlikely to be uploader's own work Jon Kolbert ( talk) 17:29, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat ( talk) 11:50, 11 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tn splitped table.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Tn splitped table.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wiki-chadwick ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

web-quality image, unlikely to be uploader's own work Jon Kolbert ( talk) 17:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat ( talk) 11:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Homosexuals Anonymous (logo).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Homosexuals Anonymous (logo).jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lionelt ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

superseded by vector version Logo of Homosexual Anonymous.svg. SERGIO aka the Black Cat 17:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat ( talk) 11:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Swarnim Startup & Innovation University logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 November 21#File:Swarnim Startup & Innovation University logo.svg. xplicit 06:24, 21 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Swarnim Startup & Innovation University logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Muhandes ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Seems like this file is simple enough to be public domain in the US, and thus may need to be tagged with {{ PD-logo}}. Steel1943 ( talk) 19:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. Is this a reason for deletion? If you think it should be tagged as {{ PD-logo}} go ahead and do that. -- Muhandes ( talk) 19:15, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply
    @ Muhandes: This isn't necessarily a deletion discussion, that's why it's called "Files for discussion". It's necessary to obtain consensus before switching a tag to {{ PD-textlogo}}. Jon Kolbert ( talk) 19:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply
I don't come here much so maybe this is the practice. Anyway, that's not what the blue box at the top says, someone should fix it. Have fun discussing it. -- Muhandes ( talk) 19:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply
@ Muhandes: In clear cases of an image being free in the United States, I replace the non-free rationale template with {{ Information}} and the non-free licensing template with {{ PD-logo}} or whichever related template. However, I'm not sure enough about this one to boldly make the changes myself due to the curvy shapes in the logo. Thus, I'm seeking input and consensus to make the changes. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TimelineofPhilopoemen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:TimelineofPhilopoemen.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Theonewhoisawitch ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

no suitable for encyclopedic use, if useful it should be converted to a table. Jon Kolbert ( talk) 19:58, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 11:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Barb Wire Dolls.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 08:07, 21 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Barb Wire Dolls.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Almabes ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Seems like a professional photo, but at the present time, I cannot confirm whether or not this photo is copyright infringement due to not finding this photo published elsewhere online. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:11, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Keep:Nope. I'm not a professional photographer. Yes they were posing, but I was in the right place at the right time and happened to be quick on the draw with my phone after the show, despite the intense ringing in my head. Is their any other proof that I can offer that I took this photo myself? Also, thanks for the compliment on my photography skills. Almabes ( talk) 12:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC) reply
    • @ Almabes: That's rather good resolution for a phone's camera. But yes, if no proof comes up during this discussion about this photo being posted elsewhere, what I said is definitely a compliment. (I just always have to be suspicious of professional-grade photos since most are indeed copyright infringement, considering that is what I have discovered over time from experience.) Steel1943 ( talk) 18:49, 10 November 2017 (UTC) reply
      • The metadata doesn't lie. I do have a Galaxy S8+. Pictures similar to mine *may* show up online because there were two photographers with nice Nikon DSLRs to both my right and left at the time the picture was taken. Almabes ( talk) 15:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - No reason to doubt the own work claim, especially given the EXIF showing a phone camera. -- Whpq ( talk)
  • I have a load of other pics from that night. Including some shots of individual members of the band. Almabes ( talk) 21:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Procedural close, wrong forum. If you're seeking media file/copyright assistance, please use Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks, FASTILY 06:45, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Muntuwandi ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is dcw2003. I am looking to use the photo file Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving.jpg in the file Bernard S. Cohen, and was wondering if this would be acceptable, as the Loving case was the most important of Attorney Bernard S. Cohen's career. Thank-you for any help in this regard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dcw2003 ( talkcontribs) 21:48, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IreneDebbie.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 November 21#File:IreneDebbie.JPG. xplicit 06:24, 21 November 2017 (UTC) reply

File:IreneDebbie.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SFTVLGUY2 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There are two media images used in the article Irene (musical), the sheet music cover in the public domain and this poster for the revival. The sheet music cover poster is used in the infobox and the revival poster is used in the Later productions. The rationale from the revival poster is "it is a key visual representation of the musical that is the subject of the article". The revoval poster fails WP:NFCC#3a in that the sheet music cover already is used in the article for means of identification and is a key visual representation of the musical. It also fails WP:NFCC#8 because there is no commentary about the poster thereby doing nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the musical. Aspects ( talk) 23:42, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Keep: This article is about the musical Irene, which was a hit 1925 show that had its *ONLY* major revival in 1973, starring Debbie Reynolds. The revival was an star vehicle for Reynolds and enjoyed extraordinary success, despite the dated nature of the musical. This image is the revival's theatre poster, showing the importance of Debbie Reynolds to the production. I am not sure that this theatre poster is even under copyright. No copyright notice seems to appear on the poster (perhaps the image should be converted to "free"?). In any case, there are no other free images that would adequately represent this important production, and the poster is the best image to represent this the musical, with the original artwork for the musical showing Reynolds in the title role. The image is extremely helpful to our viewers, especially when compared with the artwork from the original 1925 production. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 00:45, 10 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The poster does not show the importance of Debbie Reynolds to the production, only that she was in the show. There does not need to be an image for the any revival of shows unless there was critical commentary about the image itself in the article. Lacking this critical commentary, the poster still fails WP:NFCC#8. Aspects ( talk) 00:00, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The poster shows only Reynolds -- there is nothing else on the poster! It emphasizes that the production was revived as a star turn for Reynolds; this revival was the only major production of the musical after 1923. The poster also illustrates the *tone* and style of the production, so its visual contribution to the article is important to the reader's understanding of the revival. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 21:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.