The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
The source states it is copyrighted, and doesn't say it is under Creative Commons. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 07:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Missing evidence of permission, also seems to be non-commercial use only. Kelly hi! 10:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. ℯ xplicit 00:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
The "own work" claim and self-made licenses are implausible. The image is a promotional poster for a film and certainly copyrighted by the film's production company. — Aɴɢʀ ( talk) 14:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the UK. Kelly hi! 16:45, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Free image available at File:GuyGibson.grave.jpg. Kelly hi! 16:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Free images of this engine available at Commons:Category:Rolls-Royce Tyne. Kelly hi! 16:53, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Image is an unattributed derivative of File:Danny DeVito cropped and edited for brightness.jpg which was used for vandalism. No foreseeable use for this image. Whpq ( talk) 17:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
I don't believe the given fair use rationale is enough to justify using this non-free image over freely licensed photos of Rauner and Madigan. clpo13( talk) 18:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)