The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleteczar 04:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)reply
You could have deleted the file if it violates any rule. I do not understand what is there to discuss about a violation of rule. It's very difficult to be a contributor to Wikipedia. Don't know from where a rule will be quoted, while there is no way to read all the rules in one place. Sir, I wish to know the URL of the page where all the rules are indexed.--UKSharma3 04:16, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Sir, the rule is already linked at
WP:NFCC under "Contextual significance". Since I am a normal editor, I can't just delete files; that is something only
admins can do. Which is why I nominated this for deletion. As for one way to "read all the rules in one place", please read
WP:Policies and guidelines. Or if it is too long, it is enough to know just about the
five pillars. Kailash29792(talk) 04:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Thank you very much for the information. --UKSharma3 05:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
For the record, if this is actually the film's poster, it would be fine usage with a fair use rationale, similar to how the title card (added later) is being used, but you'd have to choose between the two in terms of which best identifies the film czar 04:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleteczar 04:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Unused, possible derivative of non-free content (statue)
FASTILY 04:34, 17 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleteczar 04:22, 25 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.