The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The file in question is a non-free screenshot of Mario Kart: Double Dash!! that is meant for use in the Lakitu article to illustrate the character. First, the character appears tiny in the image and is partially obscured (nearly invisible at thumbnail size), making it a very poor representation of the article's subject. Second, the actual depiction of the character is no different than the other, clearer, non-free promotional image that is used in the article already and is a more useful depiction. In short, it is a very poor non-free image for a purpose that has already been fulfilled. ThomasO1989 ( talk) 00:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The file is a non-free screenshot of Mario Kart: Double Dash!! which is meant "To demonstrate the elements of the game, including racing as a team." The screenshot itself is an extremely poor choice, as any of the "elements" the image was attempting to represent are concealed with a giant "START!" smacked in the middle of image. This non-free image is completely inappropriate for representing the article subject. -- ThomasO1989 ( talk) 00:27, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-free image whose only use in on Matt Vasgersian. Fails WP:NFCC#1 in that Mr. Vasgersian is living and a free photo could presumably be taken of him. Additionally, the rationale is not specific to the use in Matt Vasgersian, with passages such as "The image is used for identification and clarification in the context of critical commentary of the work from which the screenshot is taken" which are inapplicable for the biography article in which it appears. RJaguar3 | u | t 02:39, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Suprerceeded by vector, Was tagged for commons, but bot de-tagged. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Obseleted, This was tagged for Commons, but a bot de-tagged. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:43, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Obseleted, Was tagged for Commons, but bot de-tagged. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:14, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Noncommercial: flickr.com Edgars2007 ( talk/ contribs) 10:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Obseleted by vector, Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:04, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Legoktm ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Obseleted by Vector, Was tagged for Commons, but bot de-tagged. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:10, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Obseleted by vector, Was tagged for Commons, but bot de-tagged. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:26, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Legoktm ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Obseleted, by vector, was tagged for Commons, but bot de-tagged. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:31, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Legoktm ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Obselted by vector, Was tagged for Commons, but de-tagged by bot Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Obselted by vector, Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:10, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Obesleted, Was tagged for Commons, but bot de-tagged Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:38, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 10 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Replaceable non-free image; the underlying copyrighted maps data can be replaced and is only incidental to the understanding gained from this image. ( ESkog)( Talk) 17:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Described incorrectly as a "Party logo", this tweak of the US Republican Party's logo appears novel and may be original art for a blog article. If that is the case, this is not reasonable fair use.
Uploader added this image to the article Republican In Name Only, but AFAIK it is entirely decorative, and not illustrative of symbols in use by any notable political movement. (Unlike the No RINOs button design used in the same article.) / edg ☺ ☭ 18:39, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Alleged to be public domain, but does not identify creator or source. Image evidently created to push a particular POV so it is likely unusable in most relevant articles. Gamaliel ( talk) 19:54, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply