< January 14 | January 16 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This is an unused image, whose intended purpose seems to be provide publicity to vandal edits. I do not see how this barnstar could be responsibly deployed, and am thus opening an FFD to gain community consensus. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 02:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image. Easily replaced by plain text using WP:MATH -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 03:03, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan unused low resolution, low quality image. Potentially a copy-vio as the same image is found on many websites including: http://marchingastrosband.webs.com/ -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 03:21, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit 01:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The photo is identified as having been created by Yvonne Öhrbom, yet was uploaded by Richard Arthur Norton. While I have no doubt that the image was uploaded in good faith, and the uploader likely had the consent of the photographer, we need to have the release of this image under this particular license confirmed by the uploader herself. To do so, either the instructions at Commons:Commons:OTRS should be followed (see Wikipedia:Volunteer Response Team for more information), or some other evidence should be provided that Yvonne Öhrbom freely-licensed this image. Absent email confirmation from the photographer, received and catalogued through OTRS, or other acceptable evidence, this image should be deleted. Skeezix1000 ( talk) 19:15, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Too blurry to be of any use. Sreejith K ( talk) 20:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
No useful description. Its not evident on which Airport lounge it is. Sreejith K ( talk) 20:38, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan low resolution, low quality image. Looks to be of a 5-headed snake like figure, but quality is so poor that it is truly unusable. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:19, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan low quality, low resolution image, with no good encyclopedic value as no details (save for colors) can truly be seen. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:22, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Unused personal photos, no encyclopedic value -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:36, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
No encyclopedic purpose, to say the least. VernoWhitney ( talk) 21:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan personal photo with no encyclopedic value -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:54, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan poor quality image with no encyclopedic value. Unable to identify what subject of image is. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 22:09, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan image with no encyclopedic value, based on image text, might be promotional -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 22:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan image with no encyclopedic context. Currently no use. Might be related to Tidal power, but unknown how, if at all. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 22:13, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan personal photo, with no encyclopedic value -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 22:24, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan image with no encyclopedic value. Can be replaced by plain text. Looks to be from a header or other use. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 22:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan image is a non-copyright logo, without an article that it belongs to. As such, there is no encyclopedic value for this simple text image -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 22:38, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan personal photo with no encyclopedic value. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 22:40, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan personal photo with no encyclopedic value. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 22:40, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image is a logo for Port A Walk. No notability, no use for logo -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 22:45, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan image is a heavily edited photo with no encyclopedic value as it depicts a car with unrealistic photo filters -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 22:47, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan personal photo with no encyclopedic value -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 22:52, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Orphan personal photo with no encyclopedic value -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 22:53, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply