The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
It's interesting, but as a non-free image, it doesn't really add any context to the article. The rational just says that "the ticket helps provide context for [the historic event]", but I think the article would be just fine without it. – Dream out loud ( talk) 03:07, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Listing after uploader removed the {{ di-disputed fair use rationale}} tag. It's just a screenshot of a singing contestant receiving his scores. Nothing in the image is irreplaceable with text, fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. Mosmof ( talk) 04:08, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Superseded by File:WASH-1400 - Table 6-3.png Magog the Ogre ( talk) 04:11, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free image whose use fails WP:NFCC#1—replaceable by the freely licensed File:4449idle.jpg. — Bkell ( talk) 06:09, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 25 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Derivative image containing copyrighted logo. Sreejith K ( talk) 06:09, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused logo for Barcardz, whose article was speedily deleted four and a half years ago. The company appears not to even exist anymore—Barcardz.com is now a website for a telephone answering service. No encyclopedic use for this logo. — Bkell ( talk) 06:46, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep. - FASTILY (TALK) 00:12, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete' Of no use to WP or Commons. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 07:04, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Jim Bandlow ( talk) 08:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC) This drawing is great for the family scrapbook, but here I am wasting time on it. reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused personal photo. No encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 07:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused, low-resolution photo of what appears to be a science fair project. No encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 07:19, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused personal photo. No encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 07:20, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused personal photo. No encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 07:22, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused image. Tagged with {{ PD-self}}, but the description says it was obtained from Russ White via e-mail, with just "gives pemission" as justification for the public-domain claim. It's unclear what encyclopedic use this image would have; it is a map of streams on one ranch in California ( Swanton Pacific Ranch), but it's not being used in that article. It seems unlikely that it could be useful in any other context. — Bkell ( talk) 08:00, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused. Description says, "The image of the list of prominent bugis which was taken from various article of wikipedia (which has given implied permission to use the image for educational purpose while some of the image - is on public domian (e.g sultan abu bakar's image - please refer to his wikipedia article)". This seems to say that some of the component images are not in the public domain, and so this image likely violates copyright. — Bkell ( talk) 08:34, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused logo, replaced by File:InvivoGen-Logo.gif. — Bkell ( talk) 09:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused wordmark for College of the Holy Cross, replaced by File:HolyCrossSealandLogotype informal.png. — Bkell ( talk) 09:19, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
This is the coat of arms of Bijeljina and obviously not uploader's own work. Sreejith K ( talk) 11:31, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Superior version exists on Commons at the same name, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Soccerball.jpg – Quadell ( talk) 13:27, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Source website gives no indication that the image is freely licensed – Quadell ( talk) 13:32, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The tilt-corrected version File:Somanath from the beach edit.jpg is superior (and identified by Portals as such), but this one is still used – Quadell ( talk) 14:36, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
It's pretty, but given the title and description I don't think it's useful. I'd love to be proved wrong, but this could really be anywhere. – Quadell ( talk) 14:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Most of this user's uploads are blatant copyvios from the Sonoma State website. I can't find this one, but I'm sure it's a copyvio. – Quadell ( talk) 14:57, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Can you definitively prove that? The fact that you can't even locate this photo to support your claim casts dubiousness on the whole thing. If you can't prove it, then I don't believe your suspicion is grounds for deletion. If you wish to alert the University of a suspected copyvio concerning easily (and frequently) duplicated photos, then I suggest you do so and determine if they would like to see them removed. 98.207.174.44 ( talk) 15:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
as above – Quadell ( talk) 14:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
As above – 98.207.174.44 ( talk) 15:29, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
as above – Quadell ( talk) 14:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
As above – 98.207.174.44 ( talk) 15:30, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned useless image created for userpage but never used Acather96 ( talk) 16:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned useless image created for userpage but never used Acather96 ( talk) 16:11, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Redundant to File:Augusto Sandino.jpg, which is properly licensed unlike this Acather96 ( talk) 16:41, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic and useless (Commons won't want it). Only used for decorative purposes in an archived talk page discussion from 5 years ago. Acather96 ( talk) 16:56, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
An animated signature that directly violates Wikipedia:Signatures#Images. Suggest replacing current uses with a normal signature. Acather96 ( talk) 16:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned signature that, if used, would directly violate Wikipedia:Signatures#Images. Also suggest salting the name as too generic. Acather96 ( talk) 17:01, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned signature, that if was used, would directly violate Wikipedia:Signatures#Images. Also not convinced that the dragon creature images were uploader-created. Also suggest salting the name as too generic and to prevent further similar images from being uploaded. Acather96 ( talk) 17:17, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned signature, that if used would directly violate Wikipedia:Signatures#Images. Acather96 ( talk) 17:19, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
A signature that directly violates Wikipedia:Signatures#Images. Suggest replacing current uses with standard signature. Acather96 ( talk) 17:21, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Signature that directly violates Wikipedia:Signatures#Images. Suggest replacing current uses with standard signature. Acather96 ( talk) 17:24, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned signature, that if used would directly violate Wikipedia:Signatures#Images. Acather96 ( talk) 17:27, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 ( talk) 17:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. Acather96 ( talk) 17:29, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. Acather96 ( talk) 17:30, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. Acather96 ( talk) 17:31, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use Acather96 ( talk) 17:32, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. Acather96 ( talk) 17:33, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. Acather96 ( talk) 17:34, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. Acather96 ( talk) 17:35, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. Acather96 ( talk) 17:36, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. Acather96 ( talk) 17:37, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete per G7 ( non-admin closure). Acather96 ( talk) 19:39, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Signature that directly violates Wikipedia:Signatures#Images. Suggest replacing current uses with plain text. Acather96 ( talk) 17:41, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 ( talk) 17:43, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Signature that directly violates Wikipedia:Signature#Images. Acather96 ( talk) 17:47, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image with no foreseeable educational use. Sreejith K ( talk) 17:53, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:11, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
WP:OR; WP:NPOV Vihelik ( talk) 17:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 24 September 2011 (UTC) reply
THIS IS NOT A SCREENCAPTURE. Saulo Talk to Me 18:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. — ξ xplicit 19:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NFCC. This contains a lot of excessive copyrighted images. JJ98 ( Talk / Contributions) 21:16, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Jimfbleak ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:18, 24 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — Ducttapeandzipties 18:00, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan 67.82.76.3 ( talk) 18:34, 24 September 2011 (UTC) reply