The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 00:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
While the uploader took the picture, it depicts a badge that will be copyright to Wiltshire Police for which we have a better copy File:Wiltspolice.png Mt king (edits) 03:27, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free TV episode screenshot. Apparently random scene, not embedded in analytical commentary, not necessary for understanding the article, purely decorative infobox use. By long-standing consensus and precedent at FFD, TV episodes are not automatically entitled to one screenshot merely for "identification"; any image needs to individually pass NFCC#8 by contributing to the understanding of explicitly discussed analytical material. (Besides, it is unclear in what way this shot would even serve as "primary visual identification" in the first place). Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:08, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned. Although Ubuntu is open-source it isnot GFDL like the current licensing states. Additionally, individual programs and images (e.g., Firefox logo) may not be freely licensed. Since it isn't in use anyway, delete it due to possible copyright problems. – Drilnoth ( T/ C) 13:39, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free movie screenshot, used in addition to another image already in infobox. Apparently random scene, not embedded in analytical commentary, not the object of explicit discussion. Meaningless boilerplate FUR. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused. Summary says, "Copyright of Junior Ridge Staff," but tagged with {{ GFDL-self-with-disclaimers}}. — Bkell ( talk) 16:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused wordmark for a school, apparently created by the uploader; no evidence that this logo has any official status. — Bkell ( talk) 16:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Tiny, unused image. Looks likely to be a copyright violation from somewhere—Google Image Search turns up several larger versions of this image (see [1]). — Bkell ( talk) 16:10, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, obsoleted by File:Venstre (DK).svg. – Drilnoth ( T/ C) 16:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Low quality (lots of noise), replaced by File:Hosea M. Knowlton cph.3b32615.jpg, howcheng { chat} 16:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
I like the new picture, it is an improvement over the old one. Thanks! Wmcewenjr
The result of the discussion was: Moved to Commons, deleted here per F8. A different file of the same name is now visible from Commons. – Drilnoth ( T/ C) 18:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
It seems, that this file if awfully bad, so that nobody doesn't want anything to do with it, moreover to transfer it to Commons. So if really is so dangerous, do something with it! Kusurija ( talk) 16:50, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit 05:42, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
as above Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
MA gov does not release works into public domain, source website marked copyrighted Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unencyclopedic in every respect. – Drilnoth ( T/ C) 17:36, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned personal image; unencyclopedic. – Drilnoth ( T/ C) 17:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
What is this? Orphaned, uploaded by blocked user, poor quality (should be SVG), probably unencyclopedic. – Drilnoth ( T/ C) 17:43, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused. No context for encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 17:44, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused. No context for encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 17:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused. No context for encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 17:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
File has sketchy fair use rationale at best but still no license. Plus the uploader has stated this is the logo but if you check the source [http;//www.cybertown.com here] you can see that it is just artwork and not the actual logo. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 18:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Copyrighted advertisement used to decorate article, meaningless pseudo-rationale. Kelly hi! 18:40, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Old superseded product logo, no discussion of this logo offered in the article text. Kelly hi! 18:48, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free image used only for decoration. The article already includes an instance of the product logo. Kelly hi! 19:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned graph, no use unless someone knows where it applies Ronhjones (Talk) 19:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete all. — ξ xplicit 05:42, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned picture of a car park, unencyclopaedic. Ronhjones (Talk) 19:50, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
fails WP:NFCC8 (does not significantly add to readers' understanding) and WP:NFCC1 (could be replaced by text description). i agree that this was a cool/important event, but this photo does not add anything beyond that added by a sentence stating that there was a radio show from an airplane Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:52, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free image being used to decorate article, which already includes an instance of the product logo. Kelly hi! 20:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Author and copyright holder not identified per WP:NFCC#10a. Kelly hi! 20:39, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. Nominated makes little sense. — ξ xplicit 05:42, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
obsolete Sandillero ( talk) 20:44, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free image decorating blended malt. Replaceable by a free image per WP:NFCC#1. Kelly hi! 21:18, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, obsoleted by superior File:Sambasflag.svg. – Drilnoth ( T/ C) 22:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply