The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:GORDON FREEMAN.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wilhelmnein ( notify | contribs).

• No rationale, not necessary to illustrate the article. _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 00:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete unclear image, does not add enough to the article. — PyTom ( talk) 01:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:13, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:HEV suit AYool.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Plumbago ( notify | contribs).

• Multiple fair use screenshots in one image, no rationale, not necessary due to the image of Gordon Freeman wearing a HEV suit already in the article. _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 00:32, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Keep Added back to article, and added rationale. The image identifies the look of the HEV suit in the two games. The HEV suit section is a large portion of the Gordon Freeman article, and so is something it makes sense to illustrate. — PyTom ( talk) 01:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Comment The HEV suit looks the same in both games, save for cosmetic improvements due to the better graphics engine. Use of 2 fair use images combined is against Wikipedia policy, and the picture of Freeman shows him wearing the suit, making this picture not necessary to "identify" the suit.-- _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 04:24, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Beg pardon, but I can't find any poilicy regarding combining two fair-use images. Can you provide a link? bahamut0013 ^words _deeds 08:56, 13 October 2009 (UTC) reply
    • OK, on WP:NFC, there is a sentence in the guidelines: Minimal usage. Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information. That means that two images combined cannot be used. And neither of the images in the screenshot are significantly important, since Freeman's picture on top also contains the HEV suit.-- _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 02:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC) reply
      • Of course, they don't convey equivalent information. The two pictures here display two different variants of the HEV suit. More importantly, they display how it looked in two different games, and how the evolving technology allowed Valve to change it's portrayal. These pictures also display how the suit is actually rendered in-game, as opposed to how it looks in concept art. — PyTom ( talk) 02:57, 15 October 2009 (UTC) reply
      • Hm. See, I interpreted that sentence of policy to mean that you shouldn't use two images if one will suffice. I don't take that to mean that two images combined into one are explicitly forbidden. In this case, even if the two images were separate, I'd agree that they both are useful enough to the article to satisfy the NFC policy, especially in comparison to eachother. You can take that as a keep !vote. bahamut0013 ^words _deeds 05:01, 15 October 2009 (UTC) reply
        • That still has nothing to do with the article itself, since the technical evolution of the graphics of the HEV suit is not mentioned at all. Therefore it has no relevance there, multiple images notwithstanding.-- _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 22:33, 15 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Image is not only two fair use images, but both images tell us nothing important that the lead image doesn't already demonstrate. Not a very good fair use image at all. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 08:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• And I have to ask a question. To both people who support the image's inclusion, I have to ask how necessary it is. Aside from technical evolution of the HEV suit's appearance, what purpose does it serve? To show what the HEV suit looks like is accomplished by looking at the lead image. I also don't look at your reasoning because an image should not be included if it does not demonstrate something discussed in the article. The technical evolution of the suit has nothing to do with the article, so it's blatantly unnecessary, and I hope the closing nom takes this into account that the only purpose provided is a purpose that doesn't involve demonstrating anything mentioned in the article no already done by another image. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 00:20, 17 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Stained glass Gordon AYool.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Plumbago ( notify | contribs).

• Has no bearing on any development info in the article, is just an easter egg and therefore is unnecessary under fair use. _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 00:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete, does not add enough to the article. — PyTom ( talk) 01:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Ντομι.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vasilisgr7 ( notify | contribs).

• The uploader claim he is the creator, but no EXIF, taken date, etc. Highly believe that he just stole a picture in the web and crop it and claim he is the creator. Matthew_hk t c 02:10, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Sp01 028.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Scalytail ( notify | contribs).

• Superfluous image. We already have an FU image illustrating the character; we do not need any more. ÷ seresin 02:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete as unnecessary non-free image. I am listed as an uploader because I reverted (and then deleted) the addition of a larger version of this image, but I do not endorse its use in the article. Chick Bowen 00:49, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Mufasatlk3.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Scalytail ( notify | contribs).

• Superfluous image. We already have an FU image illustrating the character; we do not need any more. ÷ seresin 02:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:ScarAttacksSimba.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dark hyena ( notify | contribs).

• Superfluous image. We already have an FU image illustrating the character; we do not need any more. ÷ seresin 02:58, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Scar (The Lion King).jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Scalytail ( notify | contribs).

• Superfluous image. We already have an FU image illustrating the character; we do not need any more. ÷ seresin 02:58, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Vlcsnap-5068406.png ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Scalytail ( notify | contribs).

• Superfluous image. We already have an FU image illustrating the character; we do not need any more. This iteration of the character's appearance is not different or significant enough to warrant a third image. ÷ seresin 03:00, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Adult Ariel.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by R13n13 ( notify | contribs).

• A image sufficient for character identification already exists in the article; we do not need two. ÷ seresin 03:07, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:GastonDeath.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jienum ( notify | contribs).

• An image sufficient for character identification already exists in the article; we do not need two. (Though I will say that neither are particularly informative pictures. This one is the less-informative of the two. If this is deleted, another image can be uploaded that better illustrates the character. The other image in the article can be subsequently deleted.) ÷ seresin 03:11, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:FInders Keepers Aboubou.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Samouha95 ( notify | contribs).

• We already have an FU image illustrating the character; we do not need more. This appearance of the character is not different or significant enough to warrant another image. ÷ seresin 03:13, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. The image in the infobox serves for the same purpose. -- LoЯd ۞pεth 19:20, 27 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Flixsterdotcom2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cactusjump ( notify | contribs).

• A image sufficient for character identification already exists in the article; we do not need two. ÷ seresin 03:19, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Apache warriors.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aj4444 ( notify | contribs).

• Replaceable, no verification of unique historic image status ˉˉ ^anetode ╦╩ 03:39, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Fblive4.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by One800jon ( notify | contribs).

• Very small, orphan image. O sama K 12:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Harshavarman III-20x50px.png ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Riccardo.fabris ( notify | contribs).

• Very small, orphan image. O sama K 12:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:GauzeGray 50PercentTransparent.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HarryAlffa ( notify | contribs).

• Very small, orphan image. O sama K 12:30, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Faraday sig.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bletchley ( notify | contribs).

• Small, orphan, bad JPG image. Can be replaced with File:Michael Faraday signature.svg. O sama K 12:31, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:H150.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bctwriter ( notify | contribs).

• Very small orphan image. O sama K 12:31, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Forgetmenot.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lucy Skywalker ( notify | contribs).

• Small, orphan, un-encyclopedic image. O sama K 12:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Evangelicals and Jews In An Age of Pluralism.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ramprider1350 ( notify | contribs).

• Very small, orphan image. O sama K 12:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Fyicomminc-logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Divajc ( notify | contribs).

• Small, orphan, un-encyclopedic image. O sama K 12:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:EKV-Baltron.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Karabinier ( notify | contribs).

• Looks like a logo. Orphan, no source, wrong license. O sama K 12:36, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Fr-wiki-small.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fw190a8 ( notify | contribs).

• Very small, orphan, old image. O sama K 12:53, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Bolo3.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Delmas alain ( notify | contribs).

• Very small, orphan image. O sama K 12:55, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:BreadTemplate.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Asarkees ( notify | contribs).

• Very small, orphan version of File:Breads and rolls.jpg. O sama K 12:56, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:RoyRogers8479.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pollinator ( notify | contribs).

• Derivative work Nv8200p talk 14:05, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. No evidence image is a work of the US government, thus it's non-free (and replaceable). An official senate photo should be forthcoming as well, which should be PD-US. Andrew c  ^[talk] 17:10, 13 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:PaulGKirkJr.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mrfeek ( notify | contribs).

• The National Archives state that the "vast majority of the digital images in the Archival Research Catalog (ARC) are in the public domain", but this image is not in this catalogue and the JFK library page, which hosts the image, is merely administered by the National Archives. Hekerui ( talk) 15:45, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• KEEP Fair use.

• Maybe fair use but fails WP:NFCC #1 and #8 - Nv8200p talk 02:22, 26 September 2009 (UTC) reply

• KEEP. Image is now on the U.S. Senate's page [1], which releases it into the public domain.

• Just being on a US government web page does not release an image to the public domain. The image has to have been created by a government employee in the course of their official duties. - Nv8200p talk 02:21, 26 September 2009 (UTC) reply

• Keep I usually don't participate in AFD, but since I edit political pages, and he's a Senator now, I feel I should. The image is the one displayed to my knowledge on Senate.gov, so I say keep, until he gets an offical senate picture. America69 ( talk) 14:13, 26 September 2009 (UTC) reply

I gave the actual source, being on a senate page doesn't make it free. Hekerui ( talk) 14:44, 26 September 2009 (UTC) reply

• Comment This is not a government image, so if someone wants to save it, track down who took the picture and ask for permission. If it is deleted, it will be replaced before too long, anyway. - Rrius ( talk) 07:18, 27 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Not created by the federal government, and replaceable so not fair use. Superm401 - Talk 02:08, 30 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete as nominator. No evidence that this is free. Hekerui ( talk) 21:51, 1 October 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Per above. Just because it's on his Senate site does not mean it was created by the United States Senate. Gage ( talk) 00:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:BJP tv screenshot.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Harish89 ( notify | contribs).

• Screenshot from news coverage of a party's concession speech. Nothing particularly notable, and seems replaceable by the text "they lost the election". ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 16:40, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Tata-prima-at-geneva-motor-show-2009-b.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Enthusiast10 ( notify | contribs).

• Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight ( talk) 19:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: List at PUI. kmccoy (talk) 12:29, 22 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Anvar Juraboev.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KingFace ( notify | contribs).

• Copyright Violation 70.53.42.152 ( talk) 20:08, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Question - What is the reasoning to back up the copyright violation suggestion?-- Rockfang ( talk) 10:01, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Strong Keep I see no reason to delete it. America69 ( talk) 14:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Luk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:24, 26 September 2009 (UTC) reply

File:PODSContainer.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Twalters82 ( notify | contribs).

• Contravenes WP:ADVERT adds nothing to encyclopedia, and is an attempt at viral advertising hence WP:SPAM PODs Watch ( talk) 21:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Actually, if you look at similar websites, i.e. U-Haul, ABF Freight, etc. they all have images of their containers posted. PODS Watch has been detrimental to this website, continues to harass me personally. PODS Watch continues to flag ALL posts made by me and is trying to have a reputable company removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twalters82 ( talk • contribs) 23:15, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Comment. Images on U-Haul et al, have been uploaded by independent neutral editors for the benefit of wiki. You have uploaded no less than 6 PODs photographs with the intention of viral advertising, which is a bona fide case of WP:SPAM. One has to ask why you are you trying to get as many instances of the PODS logo onto the encyclopedia, or indeed why you constantly add WP:FANCRUFT to the PODs article when other editors have asked you not to. As regards the image in question it is just PODs logo spam and adds nothing that the original logo image does, indeed I question it's copyright status as it is used on PODs corporate literature which is copyrighted not PD, I can't say more without WP:OUTING you can I! 82.132.139.133 ( talk) 05:59, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Comment from a neutral editor In PODs Watch's 11 contributions, there is no sign of harassment of Twalters82 - the only comments left on the latter's talk page is notification of Ffd nominations, and explaining the removal of part of the PODS (company) article. There was one vandalism of that article 2 weeks ago, but other than that, no overt harassment that I can see. (Incidently, I was left a message about this - that is why I am here, but I am neutral about the company). -- PhantomSteve ( Contact Me, My Contribs) 23:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Username of nominator, plus odd pattern of contributions, indicates some sort of single-purpose account. Keep the image, obviously. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 00:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply

• Keep. This is a free image. I'm not sure if it's because of freedom of panorama, or if it's because the PODS logo is made of typefaces and simple shapes, or both. But this image is both free, and a reasonable illustration of PODS's container, which is fundamental to their business model. So there's no reason not to keep it. It adds plenty to the encylopedia, and I don't see how it could be construed as viral advertising. PODS Watch, by virtue of name and action, seems to be a special purpose account devoted to removing information about PODS, without much regard to encyclopedic value. — PyTom ( talk) 01:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Speedy Delete. Should be speedy as image is a Copyvio, image is on from PODs company literature which is copyrighted not Public Domain. 82.132.139.133 ( talk) 06:19, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply

• Is there any proof of this? The image contains EXIF data that shows that it's from a camera, which makes it unlikely it's a scan from literature. (It could potentially share a source, though.) Frankly, this whole PODS situation is a total mess, for what should be a relatively minor article. — PyTom ( talk) 07:07, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply

No it is an original photo hence the EXIF, that it is also corporate imagery tells you all you need to know about the uploader. And if it is Copyrighted to PODS then it can't be PD. And if uploader has power to release into PD from corporate copyright then they shouldn't be editing their company's own article. 82.132.139.68 ( talk) 07:36, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply

• • • I think the question is: How do we know it's corporate literature? Can you point to the same picture on PODS's web site, or something like that? It seems like it would be pretty easy to take some pictures at a PODS-sponsored event, which is what it looks like Twalters has done. — PyTom ( talk) 08:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Per WP:CSD#F8.-- Rockfang ( talk) 10:10, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.