Support my favorite 2016 movie and a worthy addition to the topic.
MPJ-DK 18:06, 29 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Director comment - With the Doctor Strange movie out now I think that it should be worth bringing up in this sup nom too.
GamerPro64 19:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Doctor Strange cannot be nominated for GA until it is no longer playing in theaters. It will have until one month after its physical home media release to be nominated for a Good Article, at which point, should it pass, it will be added to this topic. -
Favre1fan93 (
talk) 19:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)reply
I know that. But it can be nominated for Peer Review to be included into the topic. 3.c in the criteria clears that up.
GamerPro64 02:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)reply
I'm sorry, but what is the point of doing that, if we're still gong to have to wait until they are GAs anyways. Especially at this point, the peer review would essentially be the GA review, considering the state of the article. -
Favre1fan93 (
talk) 05:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)reply
It was just a suggestion so that another sup nom wouldn't be needed so soon.
GamerPro64 14:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Why not add PR of the post-production movies? Having a nomination come out every 3 months seems a bit excessive.
Nergaal (
talk) 07:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Doctor Strange won't be nominated for at least 6 months, which would be the next one. But I can talk with other regular editors of these articles about PR-ing the post-production movies, so come May 2017, when Doctor Strange should be ready for GA nom, and before Guardians 2 releases, we could make one large nomination for those two, plus Spider-Man: Homecoming and Thor: Ragnarok. -
Favre1fan93 (
talk) 06:01, 15 November 2016 (UTC)reply