Good scan of famous portrait of famous 19th century Sioux chief. (What a shame that we don't have a better scan of
this even more famous photo of his Apache cotemporary).
I also support the alternative image.
Spikebrennan 19:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Weak Oppose great picture, but the caption needs some work. I would suggest using
WP:CAPS as a guide. :)
Z1720 06:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Conditional support Please improve the caption. However, the image itself is acceptable. I would also support some dust removal.--
HereToHelp 14:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment I looked at the nominated photo at 100% and saw artifacts from digital sharpening, and also saw extreme contrast. I decided to look at the original archived file and compare, and I believe the edits performed on the nominated image degrades the image quality. So I have uploaded my own edit. I have removed a few dust spots and made very, very minor adjustments to levels and sharpening. Also, I have left the original frame in because it is part of the history of the physical image (note the nom is cropped). -
Andrew c[talk] 17:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Support 2I really like Andrew c's change. I think that adding the frame adds something to the enc value and makes the whole image cooler.
Zakolantern 17:24, 5 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Yes, in this case, the frame does actually improve the image. Maybe not the white outer edge though, which is not part of the subject...
vlad§ingertlk 03:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Support 2, encyclopedic and acceptable quality. Also per Z1720 a better caption is required.--
snowolfD4(
talk /
@ ) 00:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)reply
See edited caption (which can be used on whichever version, if any, passes FP status).
Spikebrennan 14:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Support 2 Per above.
8thstar 23:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Promoted Image:Sitting Bull - edit2.jpgMER-C 03:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)reply