Support. Although it would be nice to see it in a more natural environment. Is that a juvenile by the way?, or just a different variant to what we get up in Victoria? I've never seen that colouring before.
Ðiliff«»(Talk) 11:28, 22 October 2009 (UTC)reply
It is the tasmanian subspecies, which is a tad fatter, and the white cheek patches are bigger, among other things.
File:Platycercus eximius diemenensis juvinile.jpg is a P. e. diemenensis juvenile. Main difference is lighter plumage and smaller.
Noodle snacks (
talk) 22:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Gone from Rosella article. --
jjron (
talk) 12:43, 22 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Rationale in the edit summary was image aspect ratio, rather than something wrong with the image.
Noodle snacks (
talk) 22:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Yep, why I linked to the edit. An example of why edit summaries are useful. --
jjron (
talk) 07:12, 23 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak Support Cute, but not the highest EV, and not the best background. Nezzadar☎ 13:59, 22 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Neutral per above and the blurry back leg. Nezzadar☎ 16:12, 22 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. Durova333 20:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Support: Meets the criteria, and bonus points for the motion and capturing of "personality".
Maedin\talk 06:53, 23 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. meets criteria. ~
Arjun 20:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC)reply