An image that perfectly depicts
trench warfare from 1916. There are some quality issues (scanning artifacts?), but I think the historical value outweighs the technical deficiencies.
Nominate and support. howcheng {
chat} 23:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Support though grains are visible on the sky at the top, it has a very high level of detail and high historical value is well. --antilivedT |
C 05:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
November 11, 2006 is already scheduled, and I don't know if I'll remember (or still be doing this) for 2007. :) howcheng {
chat} 17:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Can't the comet be moved to later? NauticaShades 12:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Support Dang, I almost nominated this one myself. Snooze=lose. I like the various positions of the men in the trench. It illustrates the combination of tedium, exhaustion, and fear of trench warfare. --
Bridgecross 14:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Support this is a very nice photo with historical relivence.
Pigottsm 14:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Support New perspective on the words "digging in".
TomStar81 (
Talk) 00:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Support Fairly good image, historically important.
Hello32020 02:46, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Support. Good image. I used this pic in one of my pieces of work, but didn't nominate it.:( -
jlao04 09:01, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Support. I only regret there not being a better scan. NauticaShades 12:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Support. A nice picture, but a better scan would certainly help as well. --Tewy 03:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)reply