Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2022 at 02:20:39 (UTC)
Reason
Top view of the
Grand Prismatic Spring. Technically not flawless, but good enough IMO, and used in many articles. We do have a FP of this site:
here, a low resolution side view used in the infobox of the
primary article. I think the higher resolution top view deserves a nomination. FP on Commons. If this nom passes, I will nominate the
existing aerial FP for delist.
Support as nominator –
Bammesk (
talk) 02:20, 15 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak support - detail lacking somewhat at the pixel level but partially mitigated by this being an aerial shot.
MER-C 19:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Delist older one and replace - I wasn't aware of the
other aerial FP image. This one here is much better quality. If we can accept the possibility of multiple FPs of the same figure/object, then the older aerial image should be delisted in favor of this one. --
Veggies (talk) 17:01, 20 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Veggies, about "delist and replace" see my comment in
this recent nom. I will nominate the existing aerial FP for delist shortly after (and if) this nom passes. That image isn't used in any articles, so it will certainly be delisted.
Bammesk (
talk) 01:29, 21 December 2022 (UTC)reply
In that case, I wholeheartedly support. Thanks. --
Veggies (talk) 02:17, 21 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment - I'm not sure whether, as the creator of the image, I'm allowed to vote. I would like to comment that currently there is an
aerial shot that is rated as an FP. While the present image is not technically flawless, IMO it is an improvement compared to the current aerial shot FP because the colors are closer to reality. Also, I believe the EV of the aerial shot is greater than that of the
ground-based shot because the aerial shot allows one to see the inner structure of the spring. --
Carsten Steger (
talk) 17:55, 19 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Support – The ground-level view and the aerial view are both very informative, in different ways. There are other subjects with more than one FP, and this image seems deserving to me on its own merits.
Choliamb (
talk) 22:18, 19 December 2022 (UTC)reply