Support all edits —
Tomer T 13:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose Poor quality. A downsample might improve the contrast and eliminate the excessive grain.
Alvesgaspar 14:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment I made an alternative version based on the TIFF at the LOC website. This one avoids the compression artifacts and has slightly higher contrast. --
KFP (
talk |
contribs) 15:34, 17 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose for now. Great picture, but needs serious cleanup effort. And a caption. ~
trialsanderrors 16:56, 17 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose Arad's edit takes care of the dust, but I agree it's too bright, and some distracting shadows remain (upper left and upper right corners in particular). ~
trialsanderrors 20:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Edit 2 or 3 --
Arad 14:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Edit 2 as well,
LordHarris 17:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)reply
OpposeSorry I do not like the other edits. Edit number 2 is too bright/light. Need to do a few more alternatives.
LostCity42 17:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment - Here is edit 3. Hope it's fixed now. --
Arad 21:34, 21 March 2007 (UTC)reply
OK, I added my own edit from the LoC tiff, mostly to bring out the rich details of her face, which have gotten lost in the other versions. Support Edit 4. ~
trialsanderrors 10:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Edit 4 it got the brightness best. -
Fcb981 15:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Support edit 4. I can tell just by the thumbnails. howcheng {
chat} 20:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Support edit 4 (preferred) or any of the others except edit 2.
YechielMan 00:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose Not very striking
8thstar 23:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Support edit 4. A technically excellent portrait photograph it will inevitably be encyclopedic.
Pstuart84Talk 15:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Promoted Image:Golda Meir 03265u.jpg --
KFP (
talk |
contribs) 11:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)reply