Weak support; focus isn't perfect, but I do like the "natural but not distrating" background.
J Milburn (
talk) 22:29, 27 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Question. Is this a definite ID? From the article: "It has...star-like yellow to brownish-red flowers". Doesn't seem to gel, or perhaps article is lacking some info? --
jjron (
talk) 12:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)reply
According to
this there is a rare yellow form. The Tasmanian Waratah or the Common Teatree are other examples that come in different colours. On the ID issue I am confident, google has plenty of matching examples.
Noodle snacks (
talk) 23:00, 28 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Conditional Support per nom, pending ID confirmation (see above). --
jjron (
talk) 12:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)reply
I'm confident on this ID based on charcteristics shown in the photo that correlate with
this reference:
Local in the mountains of Western Tasmania (Mt Eliza, Southwest National Park, Tasmania)
Superior ovary
Syle with thick recurved stigmatic branches
Half-nodding flower
Single terminal flower enclosed in paired, opposed, large leafy spathes.
Melburnian (
talk) 01:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)reply
If I'm reading that right it suggests flower colour is "dark red-purple or yellow", so perhaps the article could be touched up with this info. --
jjron (
talk) 12:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Support: Very nice.
Maedin\talk 21:23, 31 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Support Nice image, good EV, far superior to other images of this subject on the internet.
Melburnian (
talk) 22:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Support. Per nom. As usual, good quality shot.
Ðiliff«»(Talk) 21:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. Durova391 20:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)reply