Delist. I was thinking about nominating this one myself. Appears to have been crudely upsampled, perhaps to meet FP resolution guidelines. --
moondigger 20:21, 16 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep Have any of you guys actually been in a wildfire? This is an amazing photo. --
Fir0002 06:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)reply
We're not nominating it for deletion here, only to be taken out of featured status. Much as the subject may be stunning, the photo definitely is not. —
Vanderdecken∴∫ξφ 15:07, 17 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Delist as per above.
Dionyseus 06:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep, it is a stunning image even if it is not perfect.
Thue |
talk 11:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. Per Above.
AJ24 14:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Would
this make any difference to any of the previous votes? —
Vanderdecken∴∫ξφ 15:07, 17 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Umm... Why would it make a difference?? —
BRIAN0918 • 2006-07-17 19:08
Haha you really want this photo delisted what next......
Childzy(
Talk|
Contribs) 09:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Seriously, what does that page say that would change opinions here? —
BRIAN0918 • 2006-07-20 14:48
Keep. If it's good enough for a 2 page spread in
Time Magazine as part of its "Photos of the Year" series
[1], it's probably good enough for FP. Also, great example of Forest Service PD photos as a resource. -
Matthew Cieplak(talk)(edits) 23:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep Yesterday, I tried to see if I could find a better-quality version of the picture, but the one we have seems to be the original one (i.e. best quality). I admit that the quality is far from perfect, but the cicumstances in which the picture was taken must be taken into account. --
Glaurung 06:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong keep per Matthewcieplak. The quality is not exceptional, but the subject matter and composition should be enough to keep this as a featured picture. File quality is important, but it's not everything.
Tokugawapants 08:36, 18 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep It's very sad that an image like that could be somewhat beautiful--
Vircabutar 22:13, 18 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep, another image (in my opinion) where the scene trumps the image quality issues. If we had any good alternative I'd be happy to delist.
grenグレン 02:44, 20 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Delist, I think the quality is really too bad for FP standard. --Daĉjoпочта 14:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Delist. It's a fantastic and awe-inspiring image... unfortunately the technical flaws make it unsuitable for FP status. --
Dante Alighieri |
Talk 18:03, 21 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep once in a many many lifetime shot. -
Ravedave 07:46, 23 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Weak delist Incredible shot, very lucky to get. But it just did not turn out with the quality that is needed. Excellent subject, too much low light noise, and way too much compression artifacts. Pity.
HighInBC 16:30, 23 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep It's a great shot. I'll see the burning forest through the technical trees. --
Bagginz 05:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)reply