Comment: I really like this. Can I ask how big the hardcopy is? I'm assuming that's going to be about as big as it gets?
Josh Milburn (
talk) 18:45, 17 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The hard copy is a bit bigger than A4, but it is glossy (scanner glare was really bad on some parts of the image, particularly the top part of her hair) and printed on a porous photo paper (and thus the textures were very distracting at full size). My efforts to reduce glare and the prominence of the pores in the paper left the 600 ppi scan too soft to be uploaded at full resolution, hence the downsampling. That being said, I've uploaded a less-downsampled version. The softness is acceptable at 3000px tall (roughly the equivalent of 300 ppi) —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 00:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment It looks good, but there's some bits on the nose, just above the upper lip, and in the lower right corner that could probably use a smidgen more cleanup. Adam Cuerden(
talk) 12:24, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Nearly got it. There's a white streak, more or less vertical, below her right nostril (on the right as you're looking at her) that I'd fix, and that looks like a crack on the bottom of her chin. There's also a lighter bit between the TATT studio stamp and her hand, protruding up from the bottom of the image. Just the last couple bits on an otherwise excellent restoration (Support in the meantime) Adam Cuerden(
talk) 15:07, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply