Support as nominator --
Tomer T (
talk) 13:34, 18 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Support It is quite difficult to get sufficient lighting for any underground photography, and this is pretty good. As the article mentions, getting further images may be impossible, so this is probably the best available. Has good EV and wow factor.
Chris857 (
talk) 01:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak support It is a little dark, but as I've never seen any well lit images of this cave, the conditions are difficult, and the EV is quite high, I don't mind. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 05:31, 19 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Comment I supported at Commons but now I see hot pixels, blue in the darks and some whites. Should be cleaned up. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 09:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)reply
I don't know how to do it.
Tomer T (
talk) 09:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak Oppose EV is good, despite being somewhat soft. I'd like to see those hot pixels gone before supporting though. --
WingtipvorteXPTT∅ 22:20, 20 May 2013 (UTC)reply
As I said, I don't know how to do it. Can somebody of you do it?
Tomer T (
talk) 05:44, 21 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Great! I'll change my vote to Weak Support. --
WingtipvorteXPTT∅ 21:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose Very unbalanced lighting. Also, I get no sense of size here. I would like to see how large these crystals are in relation to any other object.--
mcshadyplTC 22:34, 20 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Um, there is a person in the picture... — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
86.160.222.57 (
talk) 23:10, 20 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Indeed. Did you read the nomination reason or the caption?
Tomer T (
talk) 05:43, 21 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak support Definitely an important photograph and probably not too easy to obtain. I'm wondering if the f/22 was a huge mistake and is causing the softness. Otherwise, with a person for scale, this is a fantastic shot. Thanks for taking care of the hot pixels. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 03:19, 25 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Yeah, I think f/22 was way overkill here. --
WingtipvorteXPTT∅ 22:38, 25 May 2013 (UTC)reply