Support as nominator --
Theparties (
talk) 11:44, 29 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Support, certainly most educational and encyclopedic. Cheers, — Cirt (
talk) 12:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Support,--In the name effort and Art — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
124.6.181.198 (
talk) 08:20, 2 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose - Visible JPG artefacting, looks like it was cleaned but ... definitely digital manipulation (that font at the bottom... no way it's a 16th century font) —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 14:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Also, priestess is spelled incorrectly. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 14:29, 29 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose- I have no idea what the "chart" was created for, when it was created or why. The original images of the
Boxer Codex, as they appear on the article's page, are beautiful and interesting. This image, combining figures from the codex, is far less valuable than the codex illustrations themselves.
Amandajm (
talk) 02:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose, for the weird text.
J Milburn (
talk) 23:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)reply