The list was kept by Dabomb87 19:43, 9 May 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list removal because I don't believe it meets the comprehensiveness standard, more particularly, 3a. The article's FLC back in November 2008 was exceptionally short, and several key points are missing entirely from the article, which I now have sources from. In addition, the prose and the reference formatting could use a lot of work; I don't believe that they are up to proper standards at all. Finally, there are several other parts to the article, such as the notes section for example, that could be improved. I'll see if I can take a look at this in a month or so, perhaps, but from my own personal experience and the sources I have recently obtained, I don't feel that the article is currently good enough to remain a featured list. NuclearWarfare ( Talk) 03:01, 28 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment from the FLRC director
(Outdent) Comment Is there a reason a short paragraph that covers these topics cannot be added rather than delisting? It doesn't seem like much work, if the sources are already at hand. Yob Mod 14:00, 29 April 2009 (UTC) reply