The list was kept by The Rambling Man 22:29, 25 August 2011 [1].
List of Aston Villa F.C. seasons ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list removal because I am helping to uphold the standards that I have been told about, which this list clearly doesn't come close to. All those pages are FAR outdated:
1- The table is not sortable
2- It doesn't meet the new
WP:ACCESS requirements
3- Hardcoded HTML font color elements should not be used.
4- The bright colours used for 1st/2nd/3rd places could well cause
accessibility issues. A pastel-coloured background would be preferable.
Regardless of whether other stuff exists with lower quality, we as wikipedians should uphold the standards to all or none at all. The double-standard is a very dangerous game to play, especially by admin. In short, this list needs a lot of work to keep its feauture status. Strawberry on Vanilla ( talk) 13:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Stop trying to sway the subject; the list meets almost none of the requirements needed to keep its feauture status. Strawberry on Vanilla ( talk) 16:53, 25 August 2011 (UTC) reply
sortable
". To achieve the "fully sortable" standard the nominator apparently expects did take further work, but was only the rearranging of the two header rows, and was achieved easily within 20 seconds.)gold
" and "silver
", or their rgb/hex equivalents in tables to highlight 1st and 2nd is in my experience a virtual standard, with no known complaints regarding readability for color blind or similar users. Symbols added for other colors used as alternate for screen readers/etc. Color scheme used meets and often exceeds AA standard referred to in
WP:COLOR. (Another 60 seconds worth of edits to add the symbols.)Not only does the nomination seem to be counter to WP:POINT (particularly given that apparently no editors or WikiProjects were notified), the list seems to meet all the requirements of WP:FL?. Afaber012 (talk) 18:13, 25 August 2011 (UTC) reply