Comments
- "own unique cinematic style" and "dubbed "Lynchian"" for instance, are these also covered by reference 1 or is this your own opinion?
- "His more notable films "... according to whom?
- Fixed, I've removed the phrase. Had intended it to be backed up by the other films (Dune, Eraserhead) not having garnered awards attention like the listed films, but that's probably a piss-poor rationale.
GRAPPLE
X
18:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
- début has become sufficiently anglicised to remove the accent.
- As you've broken down the awards by film, I think it would be great if we could have a little bit of info on each film (just a couple of sentences) and then move the wikilink from the heading into the prose for each title.
- I've added some information. It's all quite uncontroversial so I've left it uncited (I doubt that "Blue Velvet is a 1986 film" is going to be challenged, for instance). Let me know if you feel more should be added (for instance I've not summarised the tables in prose, but if you think it would be better than I'll add that).
GRAPPLE
X
18:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Tables need row and col scopes for screenreaders per
MOS:DTT.
- I've added col scopes. Row scopes are confusing me based on that page alone but I'll have a look through some other FL tables and find out how it's done in practice.
GRAPPLE
X
18:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
- I've looked over a few other FLs and I can't see this being used anywhere, so I'm a bit lost. The example given on
MOS:DTT uses a different format than the tables I've used here, should I try to rewrite them to conform to this?
GRAPPLE
X
18:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
- "Palme d'Or<" <?
- Sounds a bit retentitve, but ordinarily these kinds of lists have the tables the same format, i.e. column widths the same from section to section.
- Any reason for not linking AMPAS in the references?
- Several links with the same title exactly, I know they link to the same page but it's mildly confusing, perhaps adjust the titles to reflect the section they link to within the page?
- Any reason why "may" isn't capitlised in the link title? Even if it's in the page title, we should make it correct.
- Got it. Not keen on hypercorrecting what is essentially a quotation (which is why I had also left in the hyphens in these titles), but I'll defer to your judgement.
GRAPPLE
X
18:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Refs 17 and 19 are bare URLs, these need to be fixed.
- (For future reference these are now refs 18 and 20). These pages have the URL used as the page title. I've given them titles to reflect their content but these are simply my own coinages.
GRAPPLE
X
18:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Ref 24 is dead (and linked to a blog) and ref 3 isn't working for me at the moment...
The Rambling Man (
talk)
09:35, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Have added an archive URL for ref 24 (now ref 25). It is a blog, but in format only - it's still the Toronto Film Critics Association's official website. Ref 3 (now 4), I've replaced with a working one from the same site.
GRAPPLE
X
18:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
|