I think that this is a decent list. Hopefully you agree ;) GaryKing (
talk) 02:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Support: Question why are nominating so many pages at the same time? --
Be Black Hole Sun (
talk) 21:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)reply
I like the music. Also, I'm reviewing articles while I nominate some of my own, so I think the universe balances out :) GaryKing (
talk) 21:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Comments
Refs [6] to [9] are most definitely not specific references, they point to the home page of those various chart websites. They don't reference the claims at all.
"minus lead singer " would prefer without, a little less mathematical!
"3x Platinum " any reason why that can't be written out in English, ie. three-times Platinum?
Any reason why you re-link the albums/singles in each section? The list isn't that long so, in my humblest of humble opinions, this may be overlinking. Especially when Hey Baby, Don't Speak and Underneath It All aren't linked in the second table. Further, curious anomaly - you link the albums and singles but not the band...I'd look at the linking all over again.
Shouldn't ref 5 be "Featured artist: No Doubt" for the title? A little more descriptive than "Billboard 200".
Support: Seeing they've had so few awards, I'm surprised you've used so many references. Can't find any real fault with it, so a late support. Red157(
talk •
contribs) 16:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.