The article was kept by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 6:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC) [1].
This FA is a 2005 promotion that has not been kept up to date. The original nominator, Redux is not currently active and has not edited the article since 2005. The top contributor, DO11.10 has not edited it since 2011. The second contributor, Doc James has not made any significant edits recently. [2] A list of updates needed was posted a month ago; significant portions of the article are out of date, and there is uncited text. A number of the sources used are quite old, dating to when the article passed FAC in 2005. (see WP:MEDRS). Hopefully the WT:MED notification will result in getting this article cited, updated, and cleaned up. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 20:42, 22 February 2020 (UTC) reply
Note that I am involved in the current WikiCup, but come here from a notice posted to WP Venezuela as a relevant article.
It may not be an area I know a lot about, but when I read the article after seeing the FAR notice I saw that it is quite short and leaves me wanting for details, though it seems to be a disease about which a lot is known. This may be an issue with accurately expanding on detail, particularly in the latter sections, which have noticeably not been updated in at least 2 years. This seems to be the first issue I can find, before going into medical aspects. A good improvement should probably begin with expansion. I’ll hopefully come back with some MOS for medical articles comments. Kingsif ( talk) 23:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC) reply
No concerns with the FA status being removed if that is what people wish. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 00:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC) reply
So WP:WikiProject_Medicine are officially abandoning their FAs now? I know more about the parasite than the disease so without input from the said project, I would not feel fully competent helping here. Graham Beards ( talk) 16:56, 24 February 2020 (UTC) reply
<small>...</small>
tag to the words "Portuguese pronunciation" inside the infobox, which breaches
MOS:TEXTSIZE. I'll amend the template in the near future to allow a size parameter, which can then be set to 100% for use in infoboxes. Summary is below. --
RexxS (
talk) 21:46, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
reply|size=
parameter and using it in the article. --
RexxS (
talk) 22:17, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
replyTopic | Comments | MoS link |
---|---|---|
Text | Size: |
MOS:FONTSIZE |
Colour |
|
MOS:COLOUR |
Tables | No tables are used. | MOS:DTAB |
Images |
|
MOS:ACCIM |
Also common in chronic Chagas disease is damage to the digestive system, particularly enlargement of the esophagus or colon, affecting 10–21% of people.[2] Those with enlarged esophagus often experience pain (odynophagia) or trouble swallowing (dysphagia), acid reflux, cough, and weight loss.[2] Individuals with enlarged colon often experience constipation, which can lead to severe blockage of the intestine or its blood supply.[2] Up to 10% of chronically infected individuals develop nerve damage that can result in numbness and altered reflexes or movement.[2]I find this makes the text and ref list a bit cluttered but I haven't changed it because of WP:CITEVAR concerns.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 5:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC) [3].
I am nominating this featured article for review due to concerns with close paraphrasing. I have identified a few examples of this on the article talk page, and I suspect there might be more that can be found upon a closer review. I'd also like to point out that I took part in a FAR of this article a while back (almost ten years ago), the atmosphere of which I have no intention to recreate. Even though many of the issues pointed out then were indeed valid (ref. formats, image cluttering, lack of HQRS, MoS, etc.), the discussion degenerated to a very hostile and very heated argument. It also lasted waaaaay to long; let's keep it a bit more focused and constructive this time, please. Eisfbnore (会話) 07:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC) reply
John M Wolfson
Piotrus
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 2:28, 16 May 2020 (UTC) [9].
SandyGeorgia wrote on the talk page in January:
I skimmed the article but didn't read in depth. Since January, it looks like the lede has been reverted to the FAC version, and conscientious editors have improved some citations. There are still some uncited paragraphs, which I've tagged, and one "citation needed" tag from February. Citation style is still inconsistent; sometimes the source is named in parentheses, and sometimes it's named in a footnote. There are also NPOV concerns being raised by a tag in the Criticism section. The TOC does not look bad to me, though perhaps there are specific ideas for improvement? I agree there are too many quotations, including the full first paragraph of the "Attachment patterns" section, occasionally in "Disorganized/disoriented attachment", "Later patterns and the dynamic-maturational model", and "Child care policies". -- Beland ( talk) 00:13, 26 March 2020 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 6:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC) [10].
This is a 2008 promotion whose FAC nominator, Kim Williams has not edited Wikipedia for over three years, and that has had citation needed tags since 2016. The Records and statistics section is stubby and in need of updating. A MOS review is also needed-- I will detail those issues if someone engages. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 20:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Source review
Article: "During the close season of 1960 the British National League collapsed and the Nottingham Panthers were disbanded. Ice hockey would not return to Nottingham for the next two decades" Source: "That would be the last title win of the original Panthers with the league disbanding at the close of the 1960 season. Panthers hockey wouldn’t be seen in the city again for another two decades."
I may take a second look, if I feel inclined. Eisfbnore (会話) 03:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC) reply