The article was delisted by Casliber via FACBot ( talk) 3:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC) [1].
This article's status currently states that this article is a featured article; however, there happen to be a lot of errors, most of which are unverifiable claims, tagged by [citation needed] and [unreliable source?] tags. I have not (yet) noticed any dead links, but this article has a lot of problems, so I am hoping that we could delist this article and leave it like that until we manage to complement it once again.
Gamingforfun365
(talk) 03:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
Technical details have been purged entirely along with the unreliable Romhacking reference. This information already exists at Super Nintendo Entertainment System technical specifications anyways, apparently in exact duplicate. There are 3 new citation needed tags that were added when @ Czar removed N-Sider. I am looking for replacement sources now. After that, all tags will have been addressed. -- ferret ( talk) 15:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC) reply
What are your thoughts on the article as it stands now? Do you have concerns that are yet to be addressed? @ Gamingforfun365 and Czar: Nikkimaria ( talk) 16:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 9:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC) [2].
Per Talk:Bette Davis#Featured Article?, the article was last reviewed nearly ten years ago and needs more sourcing to remain up to featured article standard. DrKay ( talk) 11:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC) reply
Demote. An article I wish to work on but cannot due to the unavailability of the needed resources. Needs quite a lot of work. ツ FrB.TG ( talk) 12:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Casliber via FACBot ( talk) 3:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC) [3].
I am nominating this featured article for review because, the article has descended from Featured article quality. In particular, the comprehensiveness of the articles is much lower than our standard for such a broad scope article: only two academic approaches being highlighted, one of which is almost entirely unreferenced, and verging on OR (or at least appears to be). I am also worried about the contemporary literature section: it only deals with two genres, and doesn't do so with much sophistication. Adaptation of fairy tales is quite heavily explored in academia, especially with the recent surge of television adaption work like Grimm and Once Upon A Time. Moreover, that section in particular, is very poorly written and organized. I really don't like demoting articles, but this appears to be one long overdue... it needs the attention of an expert, who really understands the field (and how it has changed since 2007!), Sadads ( talk) 13:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC) reply