The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 1:54, 26 March 2022 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because, the truth is that this 2007 promoted article, in its current state, fails FA criteria: 1a, 1c, 1f (excessive blockquotes), 2b, and 2c. Sources like 'BookLocker.com', 'Firedoglake', 'YouTube'!, 'Salon', 'Today.com', etc. are not WP:RS, far from what we require for FAs: " highest quality reliable sources". The prose is not upto FA standard, combined with the fact that various citation inconsistencies and page structure issues exist. – Kavyansh.Singh ( talk) 08:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply