The article was delisted by Maralia via FACBot ( talk) 3:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC) [1].
2006 FA, not reviewed since. Complaints about lack of citations in 2011 and in October 2014, unaddressed. Also unreliable sources (fan/self-published sites like www.ofah.net and www.epguides.com, tabloid newspapers). FA nominator Bucs is inactive. Bencherlite Talk 11:17, 25 February 2015 (UTC) reply
In my view, the following are all deal breakers and mean the article does not meet the FA criteria, and I would pull up all these issues for discussion on a GA review as well:
I appreciate that is just a brief scan through the article, but from just that brief spin through I think it is currently around B/C class, certainly nowhere near an FA. The lack of sourcing is a showstopper, without that I cannot see any way of this article being quickly salvaged to retain current FA status, and would support a motion to delist.
Also pinging @ SandyGeorgia: who was involved in the original FA review. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC) reply
For reference, SteveO has replied to my message, saying "It has been obvious the article has needed work for some time, I just haven't had the time or inclination recently. I'll try to get round to it at a later point, but it won't be before the FAR ends." Bencherlite Talk 23:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC) reply