The article was kept by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 0:43, 26 September 2020 (UTC) [1].
This 2007 promotion is well out of compliance; lots of uncited text, short stubby paragraphs, and see talk page notification from 02-28. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply
{{
cn}}
to make them easier to find. As for websites being used instead of scholarly sources, that's not a valid reason for delisting it. There are many very reliable websites out there. If you have a problem with specific websites being used, please make a specific list of those so that they can be adequately reviewed. The consistent formatting of refs is something you can
fix yourself without too much trouble,
Buidhe, and it would be very much appreciated. ···
日本穣 ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe ·
Join WP Japan! 06:55, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
reply
This looks saveable, but the extensive lists at the bottom of the article will require a lot of sifting and reviewing. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 13:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC) reply
In addition to those listed in the further reading section, the following sources may be helpful in improving the sourcing of the article: b uidh e 22:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC) reply
On closer examination, it appears that the article is not comprehensive either. The above sources would support a section about cultural life in the camp, at the very least. b uidh e 23:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The notable people section seems a bit of a WP:COATRACK. That is, they appear to be covered in sources about the person, not about the camp. I am unable to find any quality article about a camp that follows this structure; to me, it would be much better to split off into List of inmates of Manzanar or equivalent, and integrate the notable people in text when discussing what they did at the camp or afterwards that makes them notable in connection to the camp. b uidh e 00:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC) reply
References