The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 2:51, 28 May 2022 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because, as outlined by T8612 on the talk page, there is an overreliance on primary sources within the article, which I agree with. There's also harvref errors. Z1720 ( talk) 13:04, 21 April 2022 (UTC) reply
well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate. Repeating Polybius and Plutarch is not a "through and representative survey of the relevant literature". Ifly6 ( talk) 19:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC) reply