About a famous short story by
Jorge Luis Borges that makes an enormous number of references to non-fictional individuals, many not well known in the English-speaking world. I believe that this article is the first good English-language guide for the perplexed. I didn't write all of it, but at this point it is mostly my work. --
Jmabel 05:08, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Lovely article (hence I'm moving this out of self-noms to uncontested). Jmabel, would you mind having a look at my copyedit? In the spirit of being bold, I corrected what looked to me like obvious errors but given the subject matter I can't be entirely sure (especially inside quotes from the story). --
Bth 10:08, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I am not supporting or opposing this one yet. I think it has potential, but it needs a lot of copyedits.
Kingturtle 04:50, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Following some suggestions by Kingturtle, I've kept strengthening this. I'd appreciate a few more people weighing in, either to endorse as a Feature or to let me know how they'd like to see it improved. --
Jmabel 07:34, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC)
This article has gone through some substantial edits. The article is more clear (as clear as such a topic can be). I endorse it now. But it would be helpful for others to give it the once-over.
Kingturtle 19:33, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC)
A lovely article indeed. When I compare it to still-unfeatured articles like
Congo Free State, however, it falls short. Could use better wikification, structure.
+sj+ 12:05, 2004 Mar 18 (UTC)
Reluctantly Object Support. I'd like to see a better organizing template (broken into historical background / context of author's other works / plot summary / analysis by others), rather than a combination of (historical bakground + analysis). However, there are precious few serious articles on fiction in WP right now, and this is a notable exception. Looking at other featured articles, I feel they should all set an example for other articles in the same genre -- having an elegant non-trivial format which helps highlight key pieces of information (useful for future authors of new articles of that type), treating some aspect of the subject, or a few of them, with special affection, &c. This article has excellent content, but is not a template model for others yet... there is parenthetical information repeated in this article which might better be left to linked-to articles, and information from other writers' analyses of the work which could be extracted and paraphrased. Despite the lengthy discussion of the book's publication process, there is a link to only one published version of the story. There could be further and better-categorized links to external analyses of such an unusual work.
+sj+ 12:26, 2004 Mar 18 (UTC)