The
old nom was very long and virtually unreadable. I'm starting this one over.
Raul654 22:45, 3 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Support To repeat my position from the un-rebooted nom. --
PresN 04:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Support, again.
jaco♫
plane 23:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Support. Seems as good as the last time I reviewed it.
Thunderbrand 23:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Support Very well written and well cited. The only issue I have is whether the quote at the end of the story section is necessary, but I don't see that as too big of a concern.
Jay32183 23:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Support Easily the best game article on Wikipedia in my opion, an definitely one of the best ones I've read on the entire site. I may be a little partial due to the fact this is one of my favorite games, though, so it may be a little more intriguing to me there.
guitarhero777777 00:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Support per un-rebooted nomination.
Nat91 03:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Support. Informative and comprehensive. In its current state, the article is excellent.
Combination 20:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Support, well written and well cited article.
Acs4b 16:17, 8 December 2006 (UTC)reply