The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 19:30, 7 August 2010 [1].
Midshipman ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I'm re-nominating Midshipman for FA status because I feel its an important military rank with an interesting history. Based on comments from the second FAC review I redid a bunch of text which was too close to the source text, and I expanded some of the sections. I look forward to your comments and suggestions. Kirk ( talk) 14:22, 19 July 2010 (UTC) reply
Sources review
Otherwise, sources look OK, no further problems. Brianboulton ( talk) 15:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC) reply
{{
dot}}
, see dot documentationI will do the USA part and the remainder of the article a bit later. Well done. I like the images too.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 15:28, 30 July 2010 (UTC) reply
That's all I got. I'll look in after the weekend or when you let me know. Good treatment of a broad topic, I can see why you have such a large bibliography.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 22:24, 30 July 2010 (UTC) reply
There are numerous images forced to a size lower than the default, and why is there bolding in the "Comparative ranks and insignia" section? Also, the images should be staggered to avoid white space. More importantly, does no one review for MOS issues anymore? Please secure a MOS review of the article. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:53, 3 August 2010 (UTC) reply
{{
Triple image}}
and the examples there use 60px as here. Other insignia harmonise with those triple sizes nicely. I was quite happy with the sizes chosen by the author (or whoever.) —
Mirokado (
talk) 20:25, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
reply