The article was not promoted by Karanacs 19:23, 14 April 2009 [1].
I am nominating this for featured article because, although it is relatively short, I believe it meets FA criteria, covers the subject comprehensively, is properly sourced, and uses images appropriately, and is ready for FAC. JGHowes talk 03:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Image review
These issues should be easy to fix. Awadewit ( talk) 05:56, 11 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose This article is not comprehensive. Two major omissions stuck out at me as I was reading. 1) A detailed description of the architecture of the mansion. The mansion is clearly a major landmark and yet there is very little description of the house itself. I would have thought that the article would have had individual sections on the mansion, the grounds/gardens, and the slave buildings, for example. 2) There is little discussion of slave life at the plantation. There are published articles on this specific topic. I found them in a "Bibliography" linked from the "For teachers" section of the NPS page. I would suggest that you do more research and expand this article. Awadewit ( talk) 21:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose In addition to everything Awadewit said (some of which I was about to add myself) I have a few nitpicks: 1800s is ambiguous as it can also mean the period of 1800–1809. Please use century format instead. There are also a couple monster paragraphs (2nd paras in 1700s and 1800s). A strictly chronological section order in the history is bit constraining. A thematic presentation that is less strictly chronological and provides more descriptive subsection titles will likely work better. -- mav ( talk) 23:17, 12 April 2009 (UTC) reply