The article was promoted by Ian Rose via FACBot ( talk) 15:29, 16 July 2015 [1].
Two of us have buffed this article up over time. We feel it looks pretty good and is within striking distance of FA status, so have at it. We'll try and fix stuff double-quick. cheers, Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Image review
Great article from two experienced editors, but of course a few nitpicks. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC) reply
I plan to review this, and will make comments as I work through it. In general, it is very well written. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 19:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC) reply
In the distribution section, you need some imperial equivalents for the metric distances.
Otherwise, the article looks great. Looking forward to giving my support. – Maky « talk » 05:18, 26 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Non-science editor here with the smallest nitpicks.
That's all. Support - Easy to read and interesting. Victoria ( tk) 00:02, 14 July 2015 (UTC) reply