The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 23:04, 25 October 2008 [1].
I'm nominating this article for featured article because I feel it meets the featured article criteria. Please leave comments and list ways for improvement shall you desire, thanks!
iMatthew (
talk) 16:27, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comments - The recent output from the wrestling project has been more and more refined as lessons are applied from each new FAC. Does that make these pay-per-view articles flawless? Here's a hint: if they were, I wouldn't be doing this.
I haven't gotten to the matches themselves yet. That will have to wait until another time. Giants2008 ( 17-14) 02:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Weak support - Keeping in mind the heavy reliance on primary and uncertain sources, which I'm paying more attention to now. It's difficult because wrestling isn't widely covered in the mainstream media. As for the name, WWE Armageddon 2006 could be an option, but that's up to the main contributors. Giants2008 ( 17-14) 03:56, 24 October 2008 (UTC) reply